From: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Alejandro Vallejo" <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] x86: Read MSR_ARCH_CAPS immediately after early_microcode_init()
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 18:42:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622174219.8871-4-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622174219.8871-1-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
Move MSR_ARCH_CAPS read code from tsx_init() to early_cpu_init(). Because
microcode updates might make them that MSR to appear/have different values
we also must reload it after a microcode update in early_microcode_init().
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
---
v4:
* Read MSR_ARCH_CAPS in early_cpu_init(). Otherwise tsx_init() doesn't
have current values in the case where microcode wasn't updated (Jan)
---
xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c | 5 +++++
xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
xen/arch/x86/tsx.c | 16 ++++------------
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
index cfcdaace12..2f895e7c7c 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
@@ -352,6 +352,11 @@ void __init early_cpu_init(void)
&c->x86_capability[FEATURESET_7c0],
&c->x86_capability[FEATURESET_7d0]);
+ if (test_bit(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPS, c->x86_capability))
+ rdmsr(MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
+ c->x86_capability[FEATURESET_m10Al],
+ c->x86_capability[FEATURESET_m10Ah]);
+
if (max_subleaf >= 1)
cpuid_count(7, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx,
&c->x86_capability[FEATURESET_7d1]);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
index e67d143c97..dda6f03f7d 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -885,5 +885,18 @@ int __init early_microcode_init(unsigned long *module_map,
if ( ucode_mod.mod_end || ucode_blob.size )
rc = early_microcode_update_cpu();
+ /*
+ * MSR_ARCH_CAPS may have appeared after the microcode update.
+ * Reload relevant fields in boot_cpu_data if so because they are
+ * needed in tsx_init().
+ */
+ if ( boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 7 )
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[FEATURESET_7d0]
+ = cpuid_count_edx(7, 0);
+ if ( cpu_has_arch_caps )
+ rdmsr(MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[FEATURESET_m10Al],
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[FEATURESET_m10Ah]);
+
return rc;
}
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c b/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c
index 80c6f4cedd..50d8059f23 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/tsx.c
@@ -39,9 +39,10 @@ void tsx_init(void)
static bool __read_mostly once;
/*
- * This function is first called between microcode being loaded, and CPUID
- * being scanned generally. Read into boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[] for
- * the cpu_has_* bits we care about using here.
+ * This function is first called between microcode being loaded, and
+ * CPUID being scanned generally. early_cpu_init() has already prepared
+ * the feature bits needed here. And early_microcode_init() has ensured
+ * they are not stale after the microcode update.
*/
if ( unlikely(!once) )
{
@@ -49,15 +50,6 @@ void tsx_init(void)
once = true;
- if ( boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 7 )
- boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[FEATURESET_7d0]
- = cpuid_count_edx(7, 0);
-
- if ( cpu_has_arch_caps )
- rdmsr(MSR_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
- boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[FEATURESET_m10Al],
- boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[FEATURESET_m10Ah]);
-
has_rtm_always_abort = cpu_has_rtm_always_abort;
if ( cpu_has_tsx_ctrl && cpu_has_srbds_ctrl )
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 17:42 [PATCH v4 0/4] Prevent attempting updates known to fail Alejandro Vallejo
2023-06-22 17:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/microcode: Allow reading microcode revision even if it can't be updated Alejandro Vallejo
2023-06-22 17:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/microcode: Ignore microcode loading interface for revision = -1 Alejandro Vallejo
2023-06-23 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2023-06-22 17:42 ` Alejandro Vallejo [this message]
2023-06-23 7:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86: Read MSR_ARCH_CAPS immediately after early_microcode_init() Jan Beulich
2023-06-29 15:02 ` Alejandro Vallejo
2023-06-22 17:42 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/microcode: Disable microcode update handler if DIS_MCU_UPDATE is set Alejandro Vallejo
2023-06-23 7:39 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230622174219.8871-4-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com \
--to=alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.