From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] scsi: Simplify scsi_cdl_check_cmd()
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 16:30:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230623073057.816199-1-dlemoal@kernel.org> (raw)
Reading the 800+ pages of SPC often leads to a brain shutdown and to
less than ideal code... This resulted in the checks of the rwcdlp and
cdlp fields in scsi_cdl_check_cmd() to have identical if-else branches.
Replace this with a comment describing the cases we are interested in
and replace the if-else code block with a simple test of the cdlp field
that is used as the function return value.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306221657.BJHEADkz-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
---
Changes from v1:
* Reword the comment to follow SPC wording for "One_command parameter
data format"
drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 37 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
index c4bf99a842f3..d0911bc28663 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
@@ -586,31 +586,22 @@ static bool scsi_cdl_check_cmd(struct scsi_device *sdev, u8 opcode, u16 sa,
if ((buf[1] & 0x03) != 0x03)
return false;
- /* See SPC-6, one command format of REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES */
+ /*
+ * See SPC-6, One_command parameter data format for
+ * REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES. We have the following cases
+ * depending on rwcdlp (buf[0] & 0x01) value:
+ * - rwcdlp == 0: then cdlp indicates support for the A mode page when
+ * it is equal to 1 and for the B mode page when it is
+ * equal to 2.
+ * - rwcdlp == 1: then cdlp indicates support for the T2A mode page
+ * when it is equal to 1 and for the T2B mode page when
+ * it is equal to 2.
+ * Overall, to detect support for command duration limits, we only need
+ * to check that cdlp is 1 or 2.
+ */
cdlp = (buf[1] & 0x18) >> 3;
- if (buf[0] & 0x01) {
- /* rwcdlp == 1 */
- switch (cdlp) {
- case 0x01:
- /* T2A page */
- return true;
- case 0x02:
- /* T2B page */
- return true;
- }
- } else {
- /* rwcdlp == 0 */
- switch (cdlp) {
- case 0x01:
- /* A page */
- return true;
- case 0x02:
- /* B page */
- return true;
- }
- }
- return false;
+ return cdlp == 0x01 || cdlp == 0x02;
}
/**
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-23 7:30 Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-06-26 7:59 ` [PATCH v2] scsi: Simplify scsi_cdl_check_cmd() Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-29 1:47 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230623073057.816199-1-dlemoal@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.