From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-3.mta1.migadu.com (out-3.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0910EC5 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 05:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 07:42:51 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1687758173; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z5xm0yL6tMpfNwaXgE7k/hFpi1rO8H47YZjf4UctCUQ=; b=vDZPjTiTo3abdwEz71qk9WLmG+/xRon3GLB4Mm/4AYg57UYWx2+6MbhbDZ/yuM5+VKhUAq 8JAuU8qrpoSdYhs07ivvwQRHHF3LRv4In9GTbjiR7wnze5sCT5nqluoP2pf/T1zfnEb2bP cb/RKQETi9AcDxt4uZbtPtcSIo4Px3w= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Andrew Jones To: Nadav Amit Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Nikos Nikoleris Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/6] arm64: enable frame pointer and support stack unwinding Message-ID: <20230626-78ae2a0aee916a655de66849@orel> References: <20230617014930.2070-1-namit@vmware.com> <20230617014930.2070-4-namit@vmware.com> <20230623-622ec2c26e09f951f42cce46@orel> <7BD2B564-E0E0-4589-8FB1-E82D5D697D13@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7BD2B564-E0E0-4589-8FB1-E82D5D697D13@gmail.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 12:22:15PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote: > > > > On Jun 24, 2023, at 3:13 AM, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > >> +extern char vector_stub_start, vector_stub_end; > > > > These aren't used until the next patch. > > > >> + > >> +int backtrace_frame(const void *frame, const void **return_addrs, int max_depth) { > > > > '{' should be on its own line. I usually try to run the kernel's > > checkpatch since we use the same style (except we're even more forgiving > > for long lines). > > I usually do use checkpatch. I guess I got sloppy. I will fix these 2 issues. > > BTW: I used the get_maintainer script to get who to send the patches to and it > included the depreciated kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu .. Ugh. Ah, thanks for pointing that out. It's safe to declare the depreciation peroid over. I just pushed a patch dropping it now. drew