All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm64: properly define SOFT_DIRTY for arm64
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 10:00:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202307040950.rfBxS8hh-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230703135526.930004-1-npache@redhat.com>

Hi Nico,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on arm/for-next arm/fixes kvmarm/next soc/for-next linus/master v6.4 next-20230703]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nico-Pache/arm64-properly-define-SOFT_DIRTY-for-arm64/20230703-220825
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230703135526.930004-1-npache%40redhat.com
patch subject: [RFC] arm64: properly define SOFT_DIRTY for arm64
config: arm64-randconfig-r022-20230703 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230704/202307040950.rfBxS8hh-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230704/202307040950.rfBxS8hh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307040950.rfBxS8hh-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   In file included from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8:
   In file included from include/acpi/ghes.h:5:
   In file included from include/acpi/apei.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/resource_ext.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/slab.h:163:
   In file included from include/linux/kasan.h:33:
   In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1110:6: error: call to undeclared function 'arch_faults_on_old_pte'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1110 |         if (arch_faults_on_old_pte())
         |             ^
   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1118:6: error: call to undeclared function 'arch_faults_on_old_pte'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1118 |         if (arch_faults_on_old_pte())
         |             ^
   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1126:6: error: call to undeclared function 'arch_faults_on_old_pte'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1126 |         if (arch_faults_on_old_pte())
         |             ^
   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1134:6: error: call to undeclared function 'arch_faults_on_old_pte'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    1134 |         if (arch_faults_on_old_pte())
         |             ^
   In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   In file included from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8:
   In file included from include/acpi/ghes.h:5:
   In file included from include/acpi/apei.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
   In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
   In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
   In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
   In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:141:
   In file included from include/linux/fs.h:33:
   In file included from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/sched/signal.h:6:
   include/linux/signal.h:97:11: warning: array index 3 is past the end of the array (that has type 'unsigned long[1]') [-Warray-bounds]
      97 |                 return (set->sig[3] | set->sig[2] |
         |                         ^        ~
   include/uapi/asm-generic/signal.h:62:2: note: array 'sig' declared here
      62 |         unsigned long sig[_NSIG_WORDS];
         |         ^
   In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   In file included from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8:
   In file included from include/acpi/ghes.h:5:
   In file included from include/acpi/apei.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
   In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
   In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
   In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
   In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:141:
   In file included from include/linux/fs.h:33:
   In file included from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/sched/signal.h:6:
   include/linux/signal.h:97:25: warning: array index 2 is past the end of the array (that has type 'unsigned long[1]') [-Warray-bounds]
      97 |                 return (set->sig[3] | set->sig[2] |
         |                                       ^        ~
   include/uapi/asm-generic/signal.h:62:2: note: array 'sig' declared here
      62 |         unsigned long sig[_NSIG_WORDS];
         |         ^
   In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   In file included from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8:
   In file included from include/acpi/ghes.h:5:
   In file included from include/acpi/apei.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
   In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
   In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
   In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
   In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:141:
   In file included from include/linux/fs.h:33:
   In file included from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/sched/signal.h:6:
   include/linux/signal.h:98:4: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array (that has type 'unsigned long[1]') [-Warray-bounds]
      98 |                         set->sig[1] | set->sig[0]) == 0;
         |                         ^        ~
   include/uapi/asm-generic/signal.h:62:2: note: array 'sig' declared here
      62 |         unsigned long sig[_NSIG_WORDS];
         |         ^
   In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   In file included from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8:
   In file included from include/acpi/ghes.h:5:
   In file included from include/acpi/apei.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
   In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
   In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
   In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:
   In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h:141:
   In file included from include/linux/fs.h:33:
   In file included from include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/rcuwait.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/sched/signal.h:6:
   include/linux/signal.h:100:11: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array (that has type 'unsigned long[1]') [-Warray-bounds]
     100 |                 return (set->sig[1] | set->sig[0]) == 0;
         |                         ^        ~
   include/uapi/asm-generic/signal.h:62:2: note: array 'sig' declared here
      62 |         unsigned long sig[_NSIG_WORDS];
         |         ^
   In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
   In file included from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8:
   In file included from include/acpi/ghes.h:5:
   In file included from include/acpi/apei.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/acpi.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/device.h:32:
   In file included from include/linux/device/driver.h:21:
   In file included from include/linux/module.h:19:
   In file included from include/linux/elf.h:6:


vim +/arch_faults_on_old_pte +1110 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h

  1099	
  1100	#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM
  1101	/*
  1102	 * if we have the DBM bit we can utilize the software dirty bit as
  1103	 * a mechanism to introduce the soft_dirty functionality; however, without
  1104	 * it this bit is crucial to determining if a entry is dirty and we cannot
  1105	 * clear it via software. DBM can also be disabled or broken on some early
  1106	 * armv8 devices, so check its availability before modifying it.
  1107	 */
  1108	static inline pte_t pte_clear_soft_dirty(pte_t pte)
  1109	{
> 1110		if (arch_faults_on_old_pte())
  1111			return pte;
  1112	
  1113		return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
  1114	}
  1115	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-04  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-03 13:55 [RFC] arm64: properly define SOFT_DIRTY for arm64 Nico Pache
2023-07-03 13:55 ` Nico Pache
2023-07-04  2:00 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-07-04  2:31 ` kernel test robot
2023-07-04  9:58 ` Nico Pache
2023-07-04  9:58   ` Nico Pache
2023-07-04 10:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-04 10:01   ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-07-04 10:08   ` Nico Pache
2023-07-04 10:08     ` Nico Pache
2023-07-16 15:10     ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-16 15:10       ` Catalin Marinas
2023-07-25 21:16       ` Nico Pache

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202307040950.rfBxS8hh-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.