All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, osalvador@suse.de, mhocko@suse.com,
	corbet@lwn.net, david@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:19:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230711181950.83027C433C7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm/memory_hotplug: document the signal_pending() check in offline_pages()
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/memory_hotplug: document the signal_pending() check in offline_pages()
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:40:50 +0200

Let's update the documentation that any signal is sufficient, and add a
comment that not only checking for fatal signals is historical baggage:
changing it now could break existing user space.  although unlikely.

For example, when an app provides a custom SIGALRM handler and triggers
memory offlining, the timeout cmd would no longer stop memory offlining,
because SIGALRM would no longer be considered a fatal signal.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230711174050.603820-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst |    2 +-
 mm/memory_hotplug.c                             |    5 +++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst~mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages
+++ a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ when still encountering permanently unmo
 (-> BUG), memory offlining will keep retrying until it eventually succeeds.
 
 When offlining is triggered from user space, the offlining context can be
-terminated by sending a fatal signal. A timeout based offlining can easily be
+terminated by sending a signal. A timeout based offlining can easily be
 implemented via::
 
 	% timeout $TIMEOUT offline_block | failure_handling
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages
+++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1843,6 +1843,11 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long st
 	do {
 		pfn = start_pfn;
 		do {
+			/*
+			 * Historically we always checked for any signal and
+			 * can't limit it to fatal signals without eventually
+			 * breaking user space.
+			 */
 			if (signal_pending(current)) {
 				ret = -EINTR;
 				reason = "signal backoff";
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are

mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-07-11 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230711181950.83027C433C7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.