All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-userfaultfd-check-for-start-len-overflow-in-validate_range-fix.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:31:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230714183154.7469BC433C7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm: userfaultfd: check for start + len overflow in validate_range: fix
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-userfaultfd-check-for-start-len-overflow-in-validate_range-fix.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-userfaultfd-check-for-start-len-overflow-in-validate_range-fix.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Subject: mm: userfaultfd: check for start + len overflow in validate_range: fix
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:29:32 -0700

This commit removed an extra check for zero-length ranges, and folded it
into the common validate_range() helper used by all UFFD ioctls.

It failed to notice though that UFFDIO_COPY *only* called validate_range
on the dst range, not the src range.  So removing this check actually let
us proceed with zero-length source ranges, eventually hitting a BUG
further down in the call stack.

The correct fix seems clear: call validate_range() on the src range too.

Other ioctls are not affected by this, as they only have one range, not
two (src + dst).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230714182932.2608735-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+42309678e0bc7b32f8e9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=42309678e0bc7b32f8e9
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/userfaultfd.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~mm-userfaultfd-check-for-start-len-overflow-in-validate_range-fix
+++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1753,6 +1753,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_copy(struct userf
 			   sizeof(uffdio_copy)-sizeof(__s64)))
 		goto out;
 
+	ret = validate_range(ctx->mm, uffdio_copy.src, uffdio_copy.len);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
 	ret = validate_range(ctx->mm, uffdio_copy.dst, uffdio_copy.len);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from axelrasmussen@google.com are

mm-make-pte_marker_swapin_error-more-general.patch
mm-userfaultfd-check-for-start-len-overflow-in-validate_range.patch
mm-userfaultfd-check-for-start-len-overflow-in-validate_range-fix.patch
mm-userfaultfd-extract-file-size-check-out-into-a-helper.patch
mm-userfaultfd-add-new-uffdio_poison-ioctl.patch
mm-userfaultfd-support-uffdio_poison-for-hugetlbfs.patch
mm-userfaultfd-document-and-enable-new-uffdio_poison-feature.patch
selftests-mm-refactor-uffd_poll_thread-to-allow-custom-fault-handlers.patch
selftests-mm-add-uffd-unit-test-for-uffdio_poison.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-07-14 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230714183154.7469BC433C7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.