All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize()
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:18:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230718131844.5706-2-guang.zeng@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230718131844.5706-1-guang.zeng@intel.com>

From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>

Consolidate @write and @fetch of __linearize() into a set of flags so that
additional flags can be added without needing more/new boolean parameters,
to precisely identify the access type.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c     | 21 +++++++++++----------
 arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 936a397a08cd..3ddfbc99fa4f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ static unsigned insn_alignment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned size)
 static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 				       struct segmented_address addr,
 				       unsigned *max_size, unsigned size,
-				       bool write, bool fetch,
-				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear)
+				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear,
+				       unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct desc_struct desc;
 	bool usable;
@@ -717,11 +717,11 @@ static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		if (!usable)
 			goto bad;
 		/* code segment in protected mode or read-only data segment */
-		if ((((ctxt->mode != X86EMUL_MODE_REAL) && (desc.type & 8))
-					|| !(desc.type & 2)) && write)
+		if ((((ctxt->mode != X86EMUL_MODE_REAL) && (desc.type & 8)) || !(desc.type & 2)) &&
+		    (flags & X86EMUL_F_WRITE))
 			goto bad;
 		/* unreadable code segment */
-		if (!fetch && (desc.type & 8) && !(desc.type & 2))
+		if (!(flags & X86EMUL_F_FETCH) && (desc.type & 8) && !(desc.type & 2))
 			goto bad;
 		lim = desc_limit_scaled(&desc);
 		if (!(desc.type & 8) && (desc.type & 4)) {
@@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ static int linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		     ulong *linear)
 {
 	unsigned max_size;
-	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, write, false,
-			   ctxt->mode, linear);
+	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, ctxt->mode, linear,
+			   write ? X86EMUL_F_WRITE : 0);
 }
 
 static inline int assign_eip(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ static inline int assign_eip(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
 
 	if (ctxt->op_bytes != sizeof(unsigned long))
 		addr.ea = dst & ((1UL << (ctxt->op_bytes << 3)) - 1);
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, false, true, ctxt->mode, &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, ctxt->mode, &linear,
+			 X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
 	if (rc == X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 		ctxt->_eip = addr.ea;
 	return rc;
@@ -907,8 +908,8 @@ static int __do_insn_fetch_bytes(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int op_size)
 	 * boundary check itself.  Instead, we use max_size to check
 	 * against op_size.
 	 */
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, false, true, ctxt->mode,
-			 &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, ctxt->mode, &linear,
+			 X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
 	if (unlikely(rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE))
 		return rc;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
index ab65f3a47dfd..86bbe997162d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ struct x86_instruction_info {
 #define X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED       5 /* IO is needed to complete emulation */
 #define X86EMUL_INTERCEPTED     6 /* Intercepted by nested VMCB/VMCS */
 
+/* x86-specific emulation flags */
+#define X86EMUL_F_WRITE			BIT(0)
+#define X86EMUL_F_FETCH			BIT(1)
+
 struct x86_emulate_ops {
 	void (*vm_bugged)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
 	/*
-- 
2.27.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 13:18 [PATCH v2 0/8] LASS KVM virtualization support Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` Zeng Guang [this message]
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: x86: Use a new flag for branch instructions Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] KVM: x86: Add an emulation flag for implicit system access Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: x86: Add X86EMUL_F_INVTLB and pass it in em_invlpg() Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: emulator: Add emulation of LASS violation checks on linear address Zeng Guang
2023-07-24  4:25   ` Chao Gao
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: VMX: Implement and apply vmx_is_lass_violation() for LASS protection Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR4.LASS Zeng Guang
2023-07-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: x86: Advertise LASS CPUID to user space Zeng Guang
2023-07-19  3:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] LASS KVM virtualization support Zeng Guang
2023-07-20  1:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-08-17  7:32   ` Zeng Guang
2023-08-17 18:18     ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-19  2:45 Zeng Guang
2023-07-19  2:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize() Zeng Guang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230718131844.5706-2-guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --to=guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.