From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
andres@anarazel.de, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] iomap: cleanup up iomap_dio_bio_end_io()
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 06:50:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230720045035.GA1811@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719195417.1704513-2-axboe@kernel.dk>
> + /*
> + * Synchronous dio, task itself will handle any completion work
> + * that needs after IO. All we need to do is wake the task.
> + */
> + if (dio->wait_for_completion) {
> + struct task_struct *waiter = dio->submit.waiter;
> + WRITE_ONCE(dio->submit.waiter, NULL);
I know the existing code got it wrong, but can you please add an empty
line after the variable declaration here?
> + /*
> + * If this dio is an async write, queue completion work for async
> + * handling. Reads can always complete inline.
> + */
> + if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(iocb->private, NULL);
> + INIT_WORK(&dio->aio.work, iomap_dio_complete_work);
> + queue_work(inode->i_sb->s_dio_done_wq, &dio->aio.work);
> + } else {
If we already do the goto style I'd probably do it here as well instead
of the else.
Otherwise this looks good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 19:54 [PATCHSET v3 0/6] Improve async iomap DIO performance Jens Axboe
2023-07-19 19:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] iomap: cleanup up iomap_dio_bio_end_io() Jens Axboe
2023-07-20 4:50 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-07-20 16:13 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-19 19:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] iomap: add IOMAP_DIO_INLINE_COMP Jens Axboe
2023-07-20 4:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-20 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-19 19:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: treat a write through cache the same as FUA Jens Axboe
2023-07-20 4:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-20 16:23 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-19 19:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: add IOCB flags related to passing back dio completions Jens Axboe
2023-07-20 5:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-20 16:25 ` Jens Axboe
2023-07-19 19:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] io_uring/rw: add write support for IOCB_DIO_DEFER Jens Axboe
2023-07-19 19:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] iomap: support IOCB_DIO_DEFER Jens Axboe
2023-07-20 4:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-20 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230720045035.GA1811@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.