From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev
To: axboe@kernel.dk, osandov@fb.com, ming.lei@redhat.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, krisman@suse.de
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhouchengming@bytedance.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] sbitmap: drop wrap logic in __sbitmap_get_word()
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 23:20:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230727152020.3633009-3-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727152020.3633009-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
The complex wrap logic in __sbitmap_get_word() seems unnecessary:
1. Strict round-robin mode: wrap == false
1.1 hint == 0: we search sb->map_nr words, won't wrap
1.2 hint > 0: we search (sb->map_nr + 1) words, won't wrap
2. Non round-robin mode: wrap == true
2.1 hint == 0: we search sb->map_nr words, don't need wrap
2.2 hint > 0: we search sb->map_nr words, need wrap
So 2.2 is the only reason we need wrap logic in __sbitmap_get_word(),
the only user like 2.2 is __sbitmap_get_shallow().
__sbitmap_get_shallow() always set wrap == true no matter the sbitmap
is round-robin or not, seems that it doesn't want strict round-robin
tag in this limited case.
We can remove 2.2 case by setting hint == 0 in __sbitmap_get_shallow(),
since there is no point in looping twice in find_next_zero_bit() if we
don't want strict round-robin tag for this case.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
lib/sbitmap.c | 47 +++++++++++++----------------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
index 6e098a46be26..d042dc5d53c3 100644
--- a/lib/sbitmap.c
+++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
@@ -134,41 +134,21 @@ void sbitmap_resize(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int depth)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_resize);
static int __sbitmap_get_word(unsigned long *word, unsigned long depth,
- unsigned int hint, bool wrap)
+ unsigned int hint)
{
int nr;
- /* don't wrap if starting from 0 */
- wrap = wrap && hint;
-
while (1) {
nr = find_next_zero_bit(word, depth, hint);
- if (unlikely(nr >= depth)) {
- /*
- * We started with an offset, and we didn't reset the
- * offset to 0 in a failure case, so start from 0 to
- * exhaust the map.
- */
- if (wrap) {
- wrap = false;
- hint = 0;
- continue;
- }
+ if (unlikely(nr >= depth))
return -1;
- }
if (!test_and_set_bit_lock(nr, word))
break;
hint = nr + 1;
- if (unlikely(hint >= depth)) {
- if (wrap) {
- wrap = false;
- hint = 0;
- continue;
- }
+ if (unlikely(hint >= depth))
return -1;
- }
}
return nr;
@@ -176,14 +156,13 @@ static int __sbitmap_get_word(unsigned long *word, unsigned long depth,
static int sbitmap_find_bit_in_word(struct sbitmap_word *map,
unsigned int depth,
- unsigned int alloc_hint,
- bool wrap)
+ unsigned int alloc_hint)
{
int nr;
do {
nr = __sbitmap_get_word(&map->word, depth,
- alloc_hint, wrap);
+ alloc_hint);
if (nr != -1)
break;
if (!sbitmap_deferred_clear(map))
@@ -196,8 +175,7 @@ static int sbitmap_find_bit_in_word(struct sbitmap_word *map,
static int sbitmap_find_bit(struct sbitmap *sb,
unsigned int depth,
unsigned int index,
- unsigned int alloc_hint,
- bool wrap)
+ unsigned int alloc_hint)
{
unsigned int map_nr = sb->map_nr;
unsigned int i;
@@ -207,7 +185,7 @@ static int sbitmap_find_bit(struct sbitmap *sb,
* If we have alloc_hint > 0 and don't wrap, we need to
* recheck sb->map[index] with hint == 0 to exhaust the map.
*/
- if (alloc_hint && !wrap)
+ if (alloc_hint)
map_nr += 1;
for (i = 0; i < map_nr; i++) {
@@ -215,7 +193,7 @@ static int sbitmap_find_bit(struct sbitmap *sb,
min_t(unsigned int,
__map_depth(sb, index),
depth),
- alloc_hint, wrap);
+ alloc_hint);
if (nr != -1) {
nr += index << sb->shift;
@@ -247,8 +225,7 @@ static int __sbitmap_get(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int alloc_hint)
else
alloc_hint = 0;
- return sbitmap_find_bit(sb, UINT_MAX, index, alloc_hint,
- !sb->round_robin);
+ return sbitmap_find_bit(sb, UINT_MAX, index, alloc_hint);
}
int sbitmap_get(struct sbitmap *sb)
@@ -275,9 +252,11 @@ static int __sbitmap_get_shallow(struct sbitmap *sb,
unsigned int index;
index = SB_NR_TO_INDEX(sb, alloc_hint);
- alloc_hint = SB_NR_TO_BIT(sb, alloc_hint);
- return sbitmap_find_bit(sb, shallow_depth, index, alloc_hint, true);
+ /* No point in looping twice in find_next_zero_bit() for this case. */
+ alloc_hint = 0;
+
+ return sbitmap_find_bit(sb, shallow_depth, index, alloc_hint);
}
int sbitmap_get_shallow(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned long shallow_depth)
--
2.41.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 15:20 [PATCH v2 1/3] sbitmap: fix hint wrap in the failure case chengming.zhou
2023-07-27 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sbitmap: fix strict round-robin non-wrap with hint > 0 chengming.zhou
2023-07-27 15:20 ` chengming.zhou [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230727152020.3633009-3-chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=krisman@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.