From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C54C001DF for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 15:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235060AbjHBPVX (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:21:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43510 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235040AbjHBPVK (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:21:10 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8D85FFC for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 08:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B3A1F68AA6; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:16:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:16:43 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Josef Bacik Cc: Christoph Hellwig , David Sterba , Chris Mason , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: small writeback fixes v2 Message-ID: <20230802151643.GA2229@lst.de> References: <20230724132701.816771-1-hch@lst.de> <20230727170622.GH17922@twin.jikos.cz> <20230801152911.GA12035@lst.de> <20230802124956.GA2070826@perftesting> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230802124956.GA2070826@perftesting> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:49:56AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I ran this through the CI Thanks a lot! > [ 3461.147888] assertion failed: block_group->io_ctl.inode == NULL, in > fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4256 Hmm, this looks so unrelated that it leaves me puzzled. How confident are you that this is a new issue based on the overall test setup? > I also got an EBUSY trying to umount $SCRATCH_MNT with generic/475 with > on an ARM machine with 64kib pagesize. Though I'm pretty sure you're not to > blame for that last failure. Thanks, Yes, I've seen EBUSY in 475 quite regulary even without the changes, I think I also mentioned it in reply to the other 475-related discussion we had. I tried to debug it for a while but didn't manage to get far.