From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D226B613F for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AECD6C433C7; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:15:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1691572556; bh=Q0uq8jXhxDiUHMy34oilY5BxQXi+jvtkpHe3hOZtILs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pIzNYGfu53aahgPC4Y84agjdk7f6WooBKwH78hh3bTjQBw1n65uv4QARSBzDY3Lp5 NPeMGRfGovct4ctk3canU8GzqPYOZCw5G/FL4lqxVrdaawxsECFCeSduSySuD3IA7u TaO2hKAftuTWh9yD36RgRXVb53VWmS+YjvcAmC2I= Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 11:15:53 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Linux kernel regressions list , Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= , Jani Nikula , LKML , Kurt Garloff , Alexander Viro , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: Drop 0fc6fea41c71 ("drm/i915: Disable DC states for all commits") from the 6.0.y series? Message-ID: <2023080930-overturn-duo-17de@gregkh> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 12:52:03PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi Greg! Months ago you picked up mainline commit a2b6e99d8a6 > ("drm/i915: Disable DC states for all commits") for the 6.1.23 release > as commit 0fc6fea41c71. It causes issues vor a few people (at least > three, two of which are CCed) -- apparently because it depends on some > change that wasn't picked up for 6.1.y. This is known for a while now, > but nobody has yet found which change that is (Al found something that > worked for him, but that didn't work for others). For the whole story > skim this ticket: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8419 > > I wonder if it might be better if you revert that commit for 6.0.y; I > asked already in the ticket if this is likely to cause regressions for > users of 6.0.y, but got no answer from the i915 devs (or did I miss > something?). :-/ Now reverted (note, 6.0.y is long dead, I reverted this for 6.1.y) thanks, greg "drowning in kernel release numbers" k-h