From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, osalvador@suse.de, mhocko@suse.com,
corbet@lwn.net, david@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 16:00:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230811230004.88C23C433C8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/memory_hotplug: document the signal_pending() check in offline_pages()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/memory_hotplug: document the signal_pending() check in offline_pages()
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:40:50 +0200
Let's update the documentation that any signal is sufficient, and add a
comment that not only checking for fatal signals is historical baggage:
changing it now could break existing user space. although unlikely.
For example, when an app provides a custom SIGALRM handler and triggers
memory offlining, the timeout cmd would no longer stop memory offlining,
because SIGALRM would no longer be considered a fatal signal.
Note that using signal_pending() instead of fatal_signal_pending() is
an anti-pattern, but slowly deprecating that behavior to eventually
change it in the far future is probably not worth the effort. If this
ever becomes relevant for user-space, we might want to rethink.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230711174050.603820-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst | 2 +-
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst~mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages
+++ a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ when still encountering permanently unmo
(-> BUG), memory offlining will keep retrying until it eventually succeeds.
When offlining is triggered from user space, the offlining context can be
-terminated by sending a fatal signal. A timeout based offlining can easily be
+terminated by sending a signal. A timeout based offlining can easily be
implemented via::
% timeout $TIMEOUT offline_block | failure_handling
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-memory_hotplug-document-the-signal_pending-check-in-offline_pages
+++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1843,6 +1843,11 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long st
do {
pfn = start_pfn;
do {
+ /*
+ * Historically we always checked for any signal and
+ * can't limit it to fatal signals without eventually
+ * breaking user space.
+ */
if (signal_pending(current)) {
ret = -EINTR;
reason = "signal backoff";
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are
mm-gup-reintroduce-foll_numa-as-foll_honor_numa_fault.patch
smaps-use-vm_normal_page_pmd-instead-of-follow_trans_huge_pmd.patch
mm-gup-handle-cont-pte-hugetlb-pages-correctly-in-gup_must_unshare-via-gup-fast.patch
kvm-explicitly-set-foll_honor_numa_fault-in-hva_to_pfn_slow.patch
mm-gup-dont-implicitly-set-foll_honor_numa_fault.patch
pgtable-improve-pte_protnone-comment.patch
selftest-mm-ksm_functional_tests-test-in-mmap_and_merge_range-if-anything-got-merged.patch
selftest-mm-ksm_functional_tests-add-prot_none-test.patch
selftest-mm-ksm_functional_tests-add-prot_none-test-fix.patch
reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230811230004.88C23C433C8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.