All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Drop legacy callback .probe_new()
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:29:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230817112900.GB986605@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230626094548.559542-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> Now that all drivers are converted to the (new) .probe() callback, the
> temporary .probe_new() can go away. \o/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> I was planning to send out this patch for inclusion into next after
> v6.5-rc1 as I thought there were only three drivers left to be converted
> before (on top of today's next/master). While preparing to submit this
> patch I noticed that a few more .probe_new were introduced in next even
> after commit 03c835f498b5 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id
> parameter"). I just sent out patches for all drivers in next that are
> still using .probe_new. These are:
> 
>  - w1: ds2482: Switch back to use struct i2c_driver's .probe()
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230612072807.839689-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
>    Krzysztof Kozlowski already signaled this won't go into 6.5-rc via
>    his tree, and he's ok if it goes in via i2c then.
> 
>  - drm/i2c: Switch i2c drivers back to use .probe()
>    https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230611202740.826120-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
>    Currently applied to
> 
> 	https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-misc.git drm-misc-next
> 
>    as d13b5d2b2b45. This won't make it onto v6.5-rc1 either.
> 
>  - watchdog: ziirave_wdt: Switch i2c driver back to use .probe()
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20230525210837.735447-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
>    Given that the merge window is open now, I doubt this will make it
>    into v6.5-rc1.
> 
>  - c4cfa2436ff6 hwmon: max31827: Switch back to use struct i2c_driver::probe
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20230626085145.554616-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> 
>  - leds: aw200xx: Switch back to use struct i2c_driver::probe
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20230626090254.556206-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> 
>  - media: i2c: ov01a10: Switch back to use struct i2c_driver::probe
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20230626090533.556406-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> 
>  - usb: typec: nb7vpq904m: Switch back to use struct i2c_driver::probe
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20230626091314.557122-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> 
>  - regulator: raa215300: Switch back to use struct i2c_driver::probe
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230626091544.557403-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> 
>  - mfd: Switch two more drivers back to use struct i2c_driver::probe
>    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230626091941.557733-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> 
> The last six were only sent today, so I guess we have to wait another
> development cycle and then get this patch into next after v6.6-rc1
> (together with the patches from above list that will have failed to get
> into v6.6-rc1).
> 
> Until we're there, feel free to already look at this patch. I was unsure
> if I should split of the change to Documentation/hwmon/pmbus.rst. As
> .probe() already works in v6.3-rc2 this hunk could go in already
> earlier, e.g. via the hwmon tree. While thinking about that, the hunk
> for Documentation/i2c/writing-clients.rst could go in before, too.
> So tell me your thoughts, then I can split as desired.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  Documentation/hwmon/pmbus.rst         |  2 +-
>  Documentation/i2c/writing-clients.rst |  2 +-
>  include/linux/i2c.h                   | 11 +----------
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-26  9:45 [PATCH] i2c: Drop legacy callback .probe_new() Uwe Kleine-König
2023-06-26 12:20 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-06-26 15:46 ` Jean Delvare
2023-08-05 16:53 ` Andi Shyti
2023-08-17 11:29 ` Lee Jones [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230817112900.GB986605@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.