From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: core: Remove unused PORT_* definitions
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 11:53:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023081954-situation-massive-269b@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230818111229.764380-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 02:12:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> For the last couple of years Linux kernel got rid of a few architectures
> and many platforms. Hence some PORT_* definitions in the serial_core.h
> become unused and redundant. Remove them for good.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h | 43 ++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> index 281fa286555c..c361570a334f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> */
> #define PORT_NS16550A 14
> #define PORT_XSCALE 15
> -#define PORT_RM9000 16 /* PMC-Sierra RM9xxx internal UART */
> +
I'm all for removing these defines, but are you sure they are not used
in any userspace code? Ususally a debian code search is good enough
"proof" of this, did you do that?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-19 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 11:12 [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: core: Remove unused PORT_* definitions Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-19 9:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-08-21 8:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-21 8:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-21 8:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023081954-situation-massive-269b@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.