[PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/3] Open-coded task_vma iter

[Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>]

At Meta we have a profiling daemon which periodically collects
information on many hosts. This collection usually involves grabbing
stacks (user and kernel) using perf_event BPF progs and later symbolicating
them. For user stacks we try to use BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID and rely on
remote symbolication, but BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID doesn't always succeed. In
those cases we must fall back to digging around in /proc/PID/maps to map
virtual address to (binary, offset). The /proc/PID/maps digging does not
occur synchronously with stack collection, so the process might already
be gone, in which case it won't have /proc/PID/maps and we will fail to
symbolicate.

This 'exited process problem' doesn't occur very often as
most of the prod services we care to profile are long-lived daemons, but
there are enough usecases to warrant a workaround: a BPF program which
can be optionally loaded at data collection time and essentially walks
/proc/PID/maps. Currently this is done by walking the vma list:

  struct vm_area_struct* mmap = BPF_CORE_READ(mm, mmap);
  mmap_next = BPF_CORE_READ(rmap, vm_next); /* in a loop */

Since commit 763ecb035029 ("mm: remove the vma linked list") there's no
longer a vma linked list to walk. Walking the vma maple tree is not as
simple as hopping struct vm_area_struct->vm_next. Luckily,
commit f39af05949a4 ("mm: add VMA iterator"), another commit in that series,
added struct vma_iterator and for_each_vma macro for easy vma iteration. If
similar functionality was exposed to BPF programs, it would be perfect for our
usecase.

This series adds such functionality, specifically a BPF equivalent of
for_each_vma using the open-coded iterator style.

Notes:
  * This approach was chosen after discussion on a previous series [0] which
    attempted to solve the same problem by adding a BPF_F_VMA_NEXT flag to
    bpf_find_vma.
  * Unlike the task_vma bpf_iter, the open-coded iterator kfuncs here do not
    drop the vma read lock between iterations. See Alexei's response in [0].
  * The [vsyscall] page isn't really part of task->mm's vmas, but
    /proc/PID/maps returns information about it anyways. The vma iter added
    here does not do the same. See comment on selftest in patch 3.
  * bpf_iter_task_vma allocates a _data struct which contains - among other
    things - struct vma_iterator, using BPF allocator and keeps a pointer to
    the bpf_iter_task_vma_data. This is done in order to prevent changes to
    struct ma_state - which is wrapped by struct vma_iterator - from
    necessitating changes to uapi struct bpf_iter_task_vma.

Changelog:

v2 -> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230821173415.1970776-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/

Patch 1 ("bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num")
  * Add Yonghong ack

Patch 2 ("bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs")
  * UAPI bpf header and tools/ version should match
  * Add bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data which bpf_iter_task_vma_kern points to,
    bpf_mem_alloc/free it instead of just vma_iterator. (Alexei)
    * Inner data ptr == NULL implies initialization failed


v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230810183513.684836-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
  * Patch 1
    * Now removes the unnecessary BTF_TYPE_EMIT instead of changing the
      type (Yonghong)
  * Patch 2
    * Don't do unnecessary BTF_TYPE_EMIT (Yonghong)
    * Bump task refcount to prevent ->mm reuse (Yonghong)
    * Keep a pointer to vma_iterator in bpf_iter_task_vma, alloc/free
      via BPF mem allocator (Yonghong, Stanislav)
  * Patch 3

Patch summary:
  * Patch 1 is a tiny fix I ran into while implementing the vma iter in this
    series. It can be applied independently.
  * Patch 2 is the meat of the implementation
  * Patch 3 adds tests for the new functionality
    * Existing iter tests exercise failure cases (e.g. prog that doesn't call
      _destroy()). I didn't replicate them in this series, but am happy to add
      them in v2 if folks feel that it would be worthwhile.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230801145414.418145-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/


Dave Marchevsky (3):
  bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num
  bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs
  selftests/bpf: Add tests for open-coded task_vma iter

 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  4 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c                         |  2 -
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c                          |  3 +
 kernel/bpf/task_iter.c                        | 84 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  4 +
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h                   |  8 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 26 +++---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/iters.c  | 71 ++++++++++++++++
 ...f_iter_task_vma.c => bpf_iter_task_vmas.c} |  0
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_vma.c      | 56 +++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{bpf_iter_task_vma.c => bpf_iter_task_vmas.c} (100%)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters_task_vma.c

-- 
2.34.1