All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc: tariqt@nvidia.com, yishaih@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	jgg@ziepe.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] mlx4: Replace the mlx4_interface.event callback with a notifier
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:04:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822140403.GF6029@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230821131225.11290-5-petr.pavlu@suse.com>

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:12:18PM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> Use a notifier to implement mlx4_dispatch_event() in preparation to
> switch mlx4_en and mlx4_ib to be an auxiliary device.
> 
> A problem is that if the mlx4_interface.event callback was replaced with
> something as mlx4_adrv.event then the implementation of
> mlx4_dispatch_event() would need to acquire a lock on a given device
> before executing this callback. That is necessary because otherwise
> there is no guarantee that the associated driver cannot get unbound when
> the callback is running. However, taking this lock is not possible
> because mlx4_dispatch_event() can be invoked from the hardirq context.
> Using an atomic notifier allows the driver to accurately record when it
> wants to receive these events and solves this problem.
> 
> A handler registration is done by both mlx4_en and mlx4_ib at the end of
> their mlx4_interface.add callback. This matches the current situation
> when mlx4_add_device() would enable events for a given device
> immediately after this callback, by adding the device on the
> mlx4_priv.list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/main.c            | 40 +++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/mlx4_ib.h         |  2 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_main.c | 26 +++++++++----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/intf.c    | 24 ++++++++----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c    |  2 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4.h    |  2 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h |  2 +
>  include/linux/mlx4/driver.h                  |  8 +++-
>  8 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-22 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-21 13:12 [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] Convert mlx4 to use auxiliary bus Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/11] mlx4: Get rid of the mlx4_interface.get_dev callback Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/11] mlx4: Rename member mlx4_en_dev.nb to netdev_nb Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/11] mlx4: Use 'void *' as the event param of mlx4_dispatch_event() Petr Pavlu
2023-08-22 14:03   ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] mlx4: Replace the mlx4_interface.event callback with a notifier Petr Pavlu
2023-08-22 14:04   ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/11] mlx4: Get rid of the mlx4_interface.activate callback Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/11] mlx4: Move the bond work to the core driver Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/11] mlx4: Avoid resetting MLX4_INTFF_BONDING per driver Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/11] mlx4: Register mlx4 devices to an auxiliary virtual bus Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/11] mlx4: Connect the ethernet part to the auxiliary bus Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/11] mlx4: Connect the infiniband " Petr Pavlu
2023-08-21 13:12 ` [PATCH net-next v3 11/11] mlx4: Delete custom device management logic Petr Pavlu
2023-08-23  7:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 00/11] Convert mlx4 to use auxiliary bus patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230822140403.GF6029@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.