From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dennis@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, cl@linux.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, shakeelb@google.com,
vegard.nossum@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] pcpcntr: add group allocation/free
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 07:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230823050609.2228718-2-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823050609.2228718-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
Allocations and frees are globally serialized on the pcpu lock (and the
CPU hotplug lock if enabled, which is the case on Debian).
At least one frequent consumer allocates 4 back-to-back counters (and
frees them in the same manner), exacerbating the problem.
While this does not fully remedy scalability issues, it is a step
towards that goal and provides immediate relief.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----
lib/percpu_counter.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
index 75b73c83bc9d..f1e7c987e3d3 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -30,17 +30,27 @@ struct percpu_counter {
extern int percpu_counter_batch;
-int __percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, gfp_t gfp,
- struct lock_class_key *key);
+int __percpu_counter_init_many(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, gfp_t gfp,
+ u32 nr_counters, struct lock_class_key *key);
-#define percpu_counter_init(fbc, value, gfp) \
+#define percpu_counter_init_many(fbc, value, gfp, nr_counters) \
({ \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
- __percpu_counter_init(fbc, value, gfp, &__key); \
+ __percpu_counter_init_many(fbc, value, gfp, nr_counters,\
+ &__key); \
})
-void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
+
+#define percpu_counter_init(fbc, value, gfp) \
+ percpu_counter_init_many(fbc, value, gfp, 1)
+
+void percpu_counter_destroy_many(struct percpu_counter *fbc, u32 nr_counters);
+static inline void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+{
+ percpu_counter_destroy_many(fbc, 1);
+}
+
void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
void percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount,
s32 batch);
@@ -116,11 +126,26 @@ struct percpu_counter {
s64 count;
};
+static inline int percpu_counter_init_many(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount,
+ gfp_t gfp, u32 nr_counters)
+{
+ u32 i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++)
+ fbc[i].count = amount;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline int percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount,
gfp_t gfp)
{
- fbc->count = amount;
- return 0;
+ return percpu_counter_init_many(fbc, amount, gfp, 1);
+}
+
+static inline void percpu_counter_destroy_many(struct percpu_counter *fbc,
+ u32 nr_counters)
+{
}
static inline void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter.c b/lib/percpu_counter.c
index 5004463c4f9f..9338b27f1cdd 100644
--- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -151,48 +151,71 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_sum);
-int __percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, gfp_t gfp,
- struct lock_class_key *key)
+int __percpu_counter_init_many(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, gfp_t gfp,
+ u32 nr_counters, struct lock_class_key *key)
{
unsigned long flags __maybe_unused;
-
- raw_spin_lock_init(&fbc->lock);
- lockdep_set_class(&fbc->lock, key);
- fbc->count = amount;
- fbc->counters = alloc_percpu_gfp(s32, gfp);
- if (!fbc->counters)
+ size_t counter_size;
+ s32 __percpu *counters;
+ u32 i;
+
+ counter_size = ALIGN(sizeof(*counters), __alignof__(*counters));
+ counters = __alloc_percpu_gfp(nr_counters * counter_size,
+ __alignof__(*counters), gfp);
+ if (!counters) {
+ fbc[0].counters = NULL;
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
- debug_percpu_counter_activate(fbc);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++) {
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&fbc[i].lock);
+ lockdep_set_class(&fbc[i].lock, key);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fbc[i].list);
+#endif
+ fbc[i].count = amount;
+ fbc[i].counters = (void *)counters + (i * counter_size);
+
+ debug_percpu_counter_activate(&fbc[i]);
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fbc->list);
spin_lock_irqsave(&percpu_counters_lock, flags);
- list_add(&fbc->list, &percpu_counters);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++)
+ list_add(&fbc[i].list, &percpu_counters);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&percpu_counters_lock, flags);
#endif
return 0;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_init);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_init_many);
-void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
+void percpu_counter_destroy_many(struct percpu_counter *fbc, u32 nr_counters)
{
unsigned long flags __maybe_unused;
+ u32 i;
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fbc))
+ return;
- if (!fbc->counters)
+ if (!fbc[0].counters)
return;
- debug_percpu_counter_deactivate(fbc);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++)
+ debug_percpu_counter_deactivate(&fbc[i]);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
spin_lock_irqsave(&percpu_counters_lock, flags);
- list_del(&fbc->list);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++)
+ list_del(&fbc[i].list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&percpu_counters_lock, flags);
#endif
- free_percpu(fbc->counters);
- fbc->counters = NULL;
+
+ free_percpu(fbc[0].counters);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_counters; i++)
+ fbc[i].counters = NULL;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_destroy);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_destroy_many);
int percpu_counter_batch __read_mostly = 32;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_batch);
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-23 5:06 [PATCH v3 0/2] execve scalability issues, part 1 Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-23 5:06 ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2023-08-24 6:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] pcpcntr: add group allocation/free Dennis Zhou
2023-08-24 10:01 ` Vegard Nossum
2023-08-23 5:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kernel/fork: group allocation/free of per-cpu counters for mm struct Mateusz Guzik
2023-08-24 6:28 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-09-06 8:25 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] execve scalability issues, part 1 Dennis Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230823050609.2228718-2-mjguzik@gmail.com \
--to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.