From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98EA1C3F for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:13:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1692825188; x=1724361188; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Tcb65uxbIPl+5ljnTMo3m9T+BxDMvqtLuF7URnuFNFE=; b=Epvn4IYZrIEtpZY+h5a6Ys67bTU1zkiI9ZphTNQ2a8vbRFFr92Euy5C9 KRLZ+11kF+lw39LiYLfn7bAHNStMTa8NaMmlMAillTmQkxVVqrG4U5wBe zX6SkV2noGJjB4MtuF60sk0NJRvtHF+INvTSABhQOinyH/y+tCgB6ImlX 4BzICfSxRVAB6qP+XTyA5Yd/Q9IkdfpGJTPCnGsO/nUBpDYAAQsoIMG5c WZbVU0R2NhD1aNaBi/Xdgas8H8uheJw6MuO6qYjN76EhJbLFd8uyqwOwp RS5J0HDTLMuHOd2NGDMWQfxNel4/NX6tiNr7bY1o73iXfjg2PeBJiQXli A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10811"; a="378026732" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,195,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="378026732" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Aug 2023 14:13:08 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10811"; a="736804038" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,195,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="736804038" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO daf8bb0a381d) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2023 14:13:06 -0700 Received: from kbuild by daf8bb0a381d with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qYvA2-0001Vt-0i; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:13:06 +0000 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 05:12:27 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Geliang Tang Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC mptcp-next v2 2/2] mptcp: add bpf_burst set/get params Message-ID: <202308240536.xHdtOcPf-lkp@intel.com> References: <486891cb494ba4e9eeb02b6e220ca670dbc80866.1692788531.git.geliang.tang@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <486891cb494ba4e9eeb02b6e220ca670dbc80866.1692788531.git.geliang.tang@suse.com> Hi Geliang, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on mptcp/export] [cannot apply to mptcp/export-net linus/master v6.5-rc7 next-20230823] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Geliang-Tang/mptcp-add-set-get-params-wrappers/20230823-190626 base: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next.git export patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/486891cb494ba4e9eeb02b6e220ca670dbc80866.1692788531.git.geliang.tang%40suse.com patch subject: [RFC mptcp-next v2 2/2] mptcp: add bpf_burst set/get params config: sparc64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230824/202308240536.xHdtOcPf-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230824/202308240536.xHdtOcPf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308240536.xHdtOcPf-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from net/mptcp/sched.c:14: include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h:64:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_sk_storage_lookup' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 64 | bpf_sk_storage_lookup(struct sock *sk, struct bpf_map *map, bool cacheit_lockit) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/mptcp/sched.c: In function 'mptcp_sched_get_params': >> net/mptcp/sched.c:211:15: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 211 | if (sk->sk_bpf_storage && sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap && | ^~ net/mptcp/sched.c:211:37: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 211 | if (sk->sk_bpf_storage && sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap && | ^~ net/mptcp/sched.c:212:23: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 212 | !strcmp(sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap->map.name, "mptcp_burst_map")) { | ^~ net/mptcp/sched.c:215:54: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 215 | sdata = bpf_sk_storage_lookup(sk, &sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap->map, true); | ^~ net/mptcp/sched.c: In function 'mptcp_sched_set_params': net/mptcp/sched.c:239:15: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 239 | if (sk->sk_bpf_storage && sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap && | ^~ net/mptcp/sched.c:239:37: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 239 | if (sk->sk_bpf_storage && sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap && | ^~ net/mptcp/sched.c:240:23: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 240 | !strcmp(sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap->map.name, "mptcp_burst_map")) { | ^~ net/mptcp/sched.c:243:54: error: 'struct sock' has no member named 'sk_bpf_storage' 243 | sdata = bpf_sk_storage_lookup(sk, &sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap->map, true); | ^~ vim +211 net/mptcp/sched.c 203 204 int mptcp_sched_get_params(struct mptcp_sock *msk) 205 { 206 struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk; 207 208 if (msk->sched == &mptcp_sched_default) 209 return msk->snd_burst; 210 > 211 if (sk->sk_bpf_storage && sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap && 212 !strcmp(sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap->map.name, "mptcp_burst_map")) { 213 struct bpf_local_storage_data *sdata; 214 215 sdata = bpf_sk_storage_lookup(sk, &sk->sk_bpf_storage->smap->map, true); 216 if (sdata) { 217 struct mptcp_burst_storage { 218 int snd_burst; 219 } *ptr; 220 221 ptr = (struct mptcp_burst_storage *)sdata->data; 222 if (ptr) 223 return ptr->snd_burst; 224 } 225 } 226 227 return 0; 228 } 229 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki