Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v1 2/2] selftests/dpll: add DPLL system integration selftests

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:59:53 +0000 Michalik, Michal wrote:
> >> The biggest concern for me is the requirement of selftests[2]:
> >>   "Don't take too long;"
> >> This approach is reloading the modules few times to check few scenarios.
> >> Also, the DPLL subsystem is being tested against multiple requests - so
> >> it takes some time to finish (not too long but is definitely not instant).  
> > 
> > I think the time constraints are more of a question of practicality.
> > A developer should be able to run the tests as part of their workflow.
> 
> That makes sense - agree. So Jakub, if I understand correctly we have a few
> different problems to solve here:
> 1) how to deploy the module:
>  - now it's separated, we should consider e.g. netdevsim
> 2) if we should have those tests a part of selftests
>  - I would remove it from selftests and move it to ./tools/testing
> 3) if we should use Python at all:
>  - fast to develop and easy to maintain
>  - might be problematic to deploy (no Python, VMs, embedded, no network etc.)
>  
> Do I understand our current outcome of the discussion correctly?

Yes, and on (3) unless someone objects let's stick to Python.