All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: generalize calculation of skb extensions length
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 11:08:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230824090819.GG3523530@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823-skb_ext-simplify-v2-1-66e26cd66860@weissschuh.net>

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 11:28:38AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Remove the necessity to modify skb_ext_total_length() when new extension
> types are added.
> Also reduces the line count a bit.
> 
> With optimizations enabled the function is folded down to the same
> constant value as before during compilation.
> This has been validated on x86 with GCC 6.5.0 and 13.2.1.
> Also a similar construct has been validated on godbolt.org with GCC 5.1.
> In any case the compiler has to be able to evaluate the construct at
> compile-time for the BUILD_BUG_ON() in skb_extensions_init().
> 
> Even if not evaluated at compile-time this function would only ever
> be executed once at run-time, so the overhead would be very minuscule.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>





  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-24  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-23  9:28 [PATCH net-next v2] net: generalize calculation of skb extensions length Thomas Weißschuh
2023-08-24  9:08 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-08-24 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230824090819.GG3523530@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=robimarko@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.