Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to

[Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:49:22AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> It's somewhat unfortunate but with (my?) the current tooling
> if people post new versions of a set in reply to an old version
> managing the review queue gets difficult. So recommend against it.

Is this something NIPA could catch?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> index 2ab843cde830..c1c732e9748b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
>  patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the
>  bottom of the priority list.
>  
> +.. _Changes requested:
> +
>  Changes requested
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  
> @@ -359,6 +361,10 @@ Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not post a new
>  version of the code if the discussion about the previous version is still
>  ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer.
>  
> +The new version of patches should be posted as a separate thread,
> +not as a reply to the previous posting. Change log should include a link
> +to the previous posting (see :ref:`Changes requested`).
> +
>  Testing
>  -------
>  
> -- 
> 2.41.0
>