From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
akrowiak@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [GIT PULL 05/22] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping keyless mode exits
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:43:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230824124522.75408-6-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824124522.75408-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
kvm_s390_skey_check_enable() does not emulate any instructions, rather,
it clears CPUSTAT_KSS and arranges the instruction that caused the exit
(e.g., ISKE, SSKE, RRBE or LPSWE with a keyed PSW) to run again.
Therefore, skip the PER check and let the instruction execution happen.
Otherwise, a debugger will see two single-step events on the same
instruction.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20230725143857.228626-6-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index db222c749e5e..9f64f27f086e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -630,8 +630,8 @@ int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
rc = handle_partial_execution(vcpu);
break;
case ICPT_KSS:
- rc = kvm_s390_skey_check_enable(vcpu);
- break;
+ /* Instruction will be redriven, skip the PER check. */
+ return kvm_s390_skey_check_enable(vcpu);
case ICPT_MCHKREQ:
case ICPT_INT_ENABLE:
/*
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-24 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-24 12:43 [GIT PULL 00/22] KVM: s390: Changes for 6.6 Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 01/22] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into interrupt handlers Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 02/22] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into program " Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 03/22] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 04/22] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated instructions Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 06/22] KVM: s390: selftests: Add selftest for single-stepping Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 07/22] s390/vfio-ap: no need to check the 'E' and 'I' bits in APQSW after TAPQ Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 08/22] s390/vfio-ap: clean up irq resources if possible Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 09/22] s390/vfio-ap: wait for response code 05 to clear on queue reset Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 10/22] s390/vfio-ap: allow deconfigured queue to be passed through to a guest Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 11/22] s390/vfio-ap: remove upper limit on wait for queue reset to complete Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 12/22] s390/vfio-ap: store entire AP queue status word with the queue object Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 13/22] s390/vfio-ap: use work struct to verify queue reset Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 14/22] s390/vfio-ap: handle queue state change in progress on reset Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 15/22] s390/vfio-ap: check for TAPQ response codes 0x35 and 0x36 Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 16/22] s390/uv: export uv_pin_shared for direct usage Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 17/22] KVM: s390: export kvm_s390_pv*_is_protected functions Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 18/22] s390/vfio-ap: make sure nib is shared Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 19/22] KVM: s390: pv: relax WARN_ONCE condition for destroy fast Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 20/22] s390/uv: UV feature check utility Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 21/22] KVM: s390: Add UV feature negotiation Janosch Frank
2023-08-24 12:43 ` [GIT PULL 22/22] KVM: s390: pv: Allow AP-instructions for pv-guests Janosch Frank
2023-08-25 13:56 ` [GIT PULL 00/22] KVM: s390: Changes for 6.6 Janosch Frank
2023-08-25 15:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-28 12:34 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230824124522.75408-6-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.