From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [paulmck-rcu:dev.2023.08.22a 67/69] kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:691:29: error: redefinition of 'next_to_cpu_idx'
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 16:55:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308251616.7HOmYRfg-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev.2023.08.22a
head: 354957ec11dc80eac68c4b1e10c237d69adc1833
commit: 62532cfc5f2be5376f0eac431783c226c35e104f [67/69] EXP qspinlock: Dump full qnode structure
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20230825 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230825/202308251616.7HOmYRfg-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230825/202308251616.7HOmYRfg-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308251616.7HOmYRfg-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:730:102: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long' but the argument has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat]
__func__, _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET, _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK, _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, _Q_TAIL_OFFSET, sizeof(qval.tail));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:478:35: note: expanded from macro 'pr_alert'
printk(KERN_ALERT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:455:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk'
#define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:427:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap'
_p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:779:
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h:298:7: warning: variable 'wait_early' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bool wait_early;
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h:407:6: warning: variable 'waitcnt' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int waitcnt = 0;
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h:493:1: warning: no previous prototype for function '__pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
__pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u8 locked)
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h:492:22: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
__visible __lockfunc void
^
static
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:780:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:660:19: error: redefinition of 'tail_to_cpu'
static __pure int tail_to_cpu(u32 tail)
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:660:19: note: previous definition is here
static __pure int tail_to_cpu(u32 tail)
^
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:780:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:665:19: error: redefinition of 'tail_to_idx'
static __pure int tail_to_idx(u32 tail)
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:665:19: note: previous definition is here
static __pure int tail_to_idx(u32 tail)
^
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:780:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:670:29: error: redefinition of 'next_to_prev'
static struct mcs_spinlock *next_to_prev(struct mcs_spinlock *msp, int *cpup, int *idxp)
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:670:29: note: previous definition is here
static struct mcs_spinlock *next_to_prev(struct mcs_spinlock *msp, int *cpup, int *idxp)
^
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:780:
>> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:691:29: error: redefinition of 'next_to_cpu_idx'
static struct mcs_spinlock *next_to_cpu_idx(struct mcs_spinlock *msp, int *cpup, int *idxp)
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:691:29: note: previous definition is here
static struct mcs_spinlock *next_to_cpu_idx(struct mcs_spinlock *msp, int *cpup, int *idxp)
^
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:780:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:712:6: error: redefinition of 'spinlock_dump'
void spinlock_dump(spinlock_t *sp, bool full)
^
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:712:6: note: previous definition is here
void spinlock_dump(spinlock_t *sp, bool full)
^
In file included from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:780:
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:730:102: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long' but the argument has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat]
__func__, _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET, _Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK, _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, _Q_TAIL_OFFSET, sizeof(qval.tail));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:478:35: note: expanded from macro 'pr_alert'
printk(KERN_ALERT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:455:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk'
#define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/printk.h:427:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap'
_p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
5 warnings and 5 errors generated.
vim +/next_to_cpu_idx +691 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
690
> 691 static struct mcs_spinlock *next_to_cpu_idx(struct mcs_spinlock *msp, int *cpup, int *idxp)
692 {
693 int cpu;
694 int idx;
695
696 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
697 struct qnode *qnp = per_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[0], cpu);
698
699 for (idx = 0; idx < MAX_NODES; idx++) {
700 if (&qnp[idx].mcs == msp) {
701 *cpup = cpu;
702 *idxp = idx;
703 return &qnp[idx].mcs;
704 }
705 }
706 }
707 *cpup = -1;
708 *idxp = -1;
709 return NULL;
710 }
711
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202308251616.7HOmYRfg-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.