From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D9CEC83F08 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D831C83C0C; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org D831C83C0C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=osuosl.org; s=default; t=1693009394; bh=MQ1DcQ2h0bAjo3HMTwhMezec4r5/5LAB+WWCZCR1c4A=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc:From; b=hWJXril5SsaqkpjlnZ/7AmgmGnlz4rFdnYF1lcd7mBdmWdoIRwixoaB2bqDve+Bfg e4jbFqViDnfbaeKTMzfmhxkYo7C6cM7hUCt7nEi5p7wC5vY2w7EhP/IVXVmIjngb4d CCrQqm1Ooq4bbaTfuSVRTF6fmmv659roXvj+MCD+QdM+vN2imuUldZunD2C2rcef8M 83gILyMycumel2JsiJLPQ7Cd/64v9lsYSMGMVRFUPQN1HPiqk9rp0RkAEkIKjK4wmN c290ISs0ErbzK+BImWkg1eckpicbROXRk1+uEv1JWA7pC9vkThmYlBJ79/ZYl71SOe dGieYWawtuzCQ== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ODZ4xzrSOFj; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E480083D1C; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E480083D1C Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DEA1BF995 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0B8401B7 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org EE0B8401B7 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKFD1x6L_FjU for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17AF940167 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 17AF940167 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB96761F6A; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F9C1C433C7; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:23:07 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alexander Lobakin Message-ID: <20230825172307.7fa89fc7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230823093158.782802-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> <20230824075500.1735790-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> <20230824082039.22901063@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1693009389; bh=p4xIvRkjsP9NejGidMaUBSV/bjLaTX6t/uNfobhVURc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s6RxF9vmYN7wRvFsBmjaD6//Sx1aBbvsMqJhznTc89BIBniNi/npaZW+jmy3MdfJi 8ZSVuCIKNvTd8Qsw9+S1ZZ5SkTOcMRPlMdwwGqgqGkNBAloLrRfzN7luzVWZ86oQkW HvkY/3Ac1A7H8krnpnHHc64TE72kmMVNOEnxEvlfqPGaBNTaJOlbRJ6IRr4aL91WUO ZszwEsrVteO4SOgXs4XyStWyISTb+zgBIf39kWw/EG/D/cxXx1mMehiSh/YgoZ6+Qe K+vS+W6hvmLWmTQWTMiEix8yAMUpVa6nIg8RZ6pWeCnpy5HgJWQdwizkZdME5ESdSp HU2lyi+78gfSg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=s6RxF9vm Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v8 00/15] Introduce the Parser Library X-BeenThere: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Wired Ethernet Linux Kernel Driver Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ivecera@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, edumazet@google.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, horms@kernel.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org Sender: "Intel-wired-lan" On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 12:52:27 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > You keep breaking the posting guidelines :( > > I already complained to people at Intel about you. > > > > The only way to push back that I can think of is to start handing out > > posting suspensions for all @intel.com addresses on netdev. Please > > Ah, that collective responsibility :D I'd call it delegating the responsibilities :) > > don't make us stoop that low. > > But seriously, please don't. Intel is huge and we physically can't keep > an eye on every developer or patch. I personally don't even know what > team the submitter is from. > Spending 8 hrs a day on tracking every @intel.com submission on > netdev is also not something I'd like to do at work (I mean, I'd > probably like reviewing every line coming out of my org, had I > 120-150 hrs a day...). I know that sounds cheap, but that's how I see > it :z Intel may be huge, but this patch is for ice specifically. And the author knows enough to put presumably-internally-mandated iwl-next tag in the subject. So how about someone steps up and points them at a manual before 4 versions are posted? _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0FD8190 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F9C1C433C7; Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:23:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1693009389; bh=p4xIvRkjsP9NejGidMaUBSV/bjLaTX6t/uNfobhVURc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s6RxF9vmYN7wRvFsBmjaD6//Sx1aBbvsMqJhznTc89BIBniNi/npaZW+jmy3MdfJi 8ZSVuCIKNvTd8Qsw9+S1ZZ5SkTOcMRPlMdwwGqgqGkNBAloLrRfzN7luzVWZ86oQkW HvkY/3Ac1A7H8krnpnHHc64TE72kmMVNOEnxEvlfqPGaBNTaJOlbRJ6IRr4aL91WUO ZszwEsrVteO4SOgXs4XyStWyISTb+zgBIf39kWw/EG/D/cxXx1mMehiSh/YgoZ6+Qe K+vS+W6hvmLWmTQWTMiEix8yAMUpVa6nIg8RZ6pWeCnpy5HgJWQdwizkZdME5ESdSp HU2lyi+78gfSg== Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:23:07 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Alexander Lobakin Cc: Junfeng Guo , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v8 00/15] Introduce the Parser Library Message-ID: <20230825172307.7fa89fc7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230823093158.782802-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> <20230824075500.1735790-1-junfeng.guo@intel.com> <20230824082039.22901063@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 12:52:27 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > You keep breaking the posting guidelines :( > > I already complained to people at Intel about you. > > > > The only way to push back that I can think of is to start handing out > > posting suspensions for all @intel.com addresses on netdev. Please > > Ah, that collective responsibility :D I'd call it delegating the responsibilities :) > > don't make us stoop that low. > > But seriously, please don't. Intel is huge and we physically can't keep > an eye on every developer or patch. I personally don't even know what > team the submitter is from. > Spending 8 hrs a day on tracking every @intel.com submission on > netdev is also not something I'd like to do at work (I mean, I'd > probably like reviewing every line coming out of my org, had I > 120-150 hrs a day...). I know that sounds cheap, but that's how I see > it :z Intel may be huge, but this patch is for ice specifically. And the author knows enough to put presumably-internally-mandated iwl-next tag in the subject. So how about someone steps up and points them at a manual before 4 versions are posted?