From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BCD6C83F01 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D62B417F5; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 9D62B417F5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=osuosl.org; s=default; t=1693427908; bh=+WmsqNIYkBNHAa6omdOzPmu40NwVuCbnwNeJKrHLYBM=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Cc:From; b=UurnGF+bykH3oixqOFU3IS20zywIQ6eQZB234Ybul/774O+Tf09/bWjBkbd97OfFe AGhxok2BNsH5TTTpNVvPH/Ro2TVpw36tZC+4+4U9QeWadFR3bgSRLxHWBO4DzO6J8J u+b/pnwSW8cZ9tEcrDmnokhv+a06f5x+VdA0RKSeJ/PCXJ9BgFv4jox2+tn7N3On8s 2YACX/H3/bTn2z/Ucqp9Cff5LWrhIepKAAaO3k8pXuGYmQvnsUHE62TLcN8XlRQnyh mRaYFWRox+A72elHHZiC2ulx5Ll+RxShFLxY9b+fIVAEepaZYLUM3d2gM5zr6zXJkM tYGvCwFp1leiw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qPgVE5xfUCTl; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7421417D8; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org B7421417D8 Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2331BF40B for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7286582D57 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 7286582D57 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2-4_53Qs9xP for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 331 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at util1.osuosl.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:24 UTC DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org F2D89826C1 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2D89826C1 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0722B82016 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E0EAC433C8; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 13:32:46 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20230830133246.1a059f0a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230829150539.6f998d1f@kernel.org> References: <20230829150539.6f998d1f@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1693427567; bh=SzzWusXtXJX5L6WVyCZuB0hjgeuxLc63hlHpUKYBYrA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iMBnXw4nwL1/LTlpQevoLpNRzuINhyInuowN0KBMiRolKd93ZVFqv6NulHZz7xJ5y w1I4ORAQ+fGZkisGNKRcqJ36ojp09wb3cF8diM6EnFoi3NFdikEjk6Yo7ETc8YXLDG nImuwK5/6Lu2DGB27luHIPeEOZknem5v91zYk/hhN5E94QQXvlDqa1G9O+QNEHR0Sy qxr/51EDOc5Lva6lfJiCst5GnfkZFXXhHYXNZhLDUqGEYXYkfCbrmi22G7C9F8V6yl FihBNAxP3aAwuV00j6UTUWPF00m+kszZG0qZTex2tDGK+Sh7rp/xDEK+1Q132b2FsN CREZrsQjysJPQ== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=iMBnXw4n Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6 X-BeenThere: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel Wired Ethernet Linux Kernel Driver Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev-driver-reviewers@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org Sender: "Intel-wired-lan" A minor follow up / question. Would it be helpful to generate these kind of stats scoped to particular companies? Very few people end up in the top 12. It may not be entirely trivial to run these scripts locally because people use their non-company addresses at times. And because of GDPR and data privacy concerns I don't want to upload raw results to GitHub or some such :( The best idea I could come up with was to post the stats to a per-company ML. Intel has the "wired" list which is a perfect fit. That way the result is accessible to developers, and they can refer to it in the "performance review" or whenever they want to get credit for upstream reviews? :) Does that sound sensible? Please don't hesitate to LMK either on or off list. Particularly if you think this is a bad idea. And LMK if any other company wants similar stats. _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D557476 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E0EAC433C8; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:32:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1693427567; bh=SzzWusXtXJX5L6WVyCZuB0hjgeuxLc63hlHpUKYBYrA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iMBnXw4nwL1/LTlpQevoLpNRzuINhyInuowN0KBMiRolKd93ZVFqv6NulHZz7xJ5y w1I4ORAQ+fGZkisGNKRcqJ36ojp09wb3cF8diM6EnFoi3NFdikEjk6Yo7ETc8YXLDG nImuwK5/6Lu2DGB27luHIPeEOZknem5v91zYk/hhN5E94QQXvlDqa1G9O+QNEHR0Sy qxr/51EDOc5Lva6lfJiCst5GnfkZFXXhHYXNZhLDUqGEYXYkfCbrmi22G7C9F8V6yl FihBNAxP3aAwuV00j6UTUWPF00m+kszZG0qZTex2tDGK+Sh7rp/xDEK+1Q132b2FsN CREZrsQjysJPQ== Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 13:32:46 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev-driver-reviewers@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Subject: Re: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6 Message-ID: <20230830133246.1a059f0a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20230829150539.6f998d1f@kernel.org> References: <20230829150539.6f998d1f@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A minor follow up / question. Would it be helpful to generate these kind of stats scoped to particular companies? Very few people end up in the top 12. It may not be entirely trivial to run these scripts locally because people use their non-company addresses at times. And because of GDPR and data privacy concerns I don't want to upload raw results to GitHub or some such :( The best idea I could come up with was to post the stats to a per-company ML. Intel has the "wired" list which is a perfect fit. That way the result is accessible to developers, and they can refer to it in the "performance review" or whenever they want to get credit for upstream reviews? :) Does that sound sensible? Please don't hesitate to LMK either on or off list. Particularly if you think this is a bad idea. And LMK if any other company wants similar stats.