[PATCH 5.10 08/11] rcu: Prevent expedited GP from enabling tick on offline CPU

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

commit 147f04b14adde831eb4a0a1e378667429732f9e8 upstream.

If an RCU expedited grace period starts just when a CPU is in the process
of going offline, so that the outgoing CPU has completed its pass through
stop-machine but has not yet completed its final dive into the idle loop,
RCU will attempt to enable that CPU's scheduling-clock tick via a call
to tick_dep_set_cpu().  For this to happen, that CPU has to have been
online when the expedited grace period completed its CPU-selection phase.

This is pointless:  The outgoing CPU has interrupts disabled, so it cannot
take a scheduling-clock tick anyway.  In addition, the tick_dep_set_cpu()
function's eventual call to irq_work_queue_on() will splat as follows:

smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 124 at kernel/irq_work.c:95
+irq_work_queue_on+0x57/0x60
Modules linked in:
CPU: 6 PID: 124 Comm: kworker/6:2 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1+ #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
+rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: rcu_gp wait_rcu_exp_gp
RIP: 0010:irq_work_queue_on+0x57/0x60
Code: 8b 05 1d c7 ea 62 a9 00 00 f0 00 75 21 4c 89 ce 44 89 c7 e8
+9b 37 fa ff ba 01 00 00 00 89 d0 c3 4c 89 cf e8 3b ff ff ff eb ee <0f> 0b eb b7
+0f 0b eb db 90 48 c7 c0 98 2a 02 00 65 48 03 05 91
 6f
RSP: 0000:ffffb12cc038fe48 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000005208 RCX: 0000000000000020
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff9ad01f45a680
RBP: 000000000004c990 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff9ad01f45a680
R10: ffffb12cc0317db0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 00000000fffecee8
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000026980 R15: ffffffff9e53ae00
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ad01f580000(0000)
+knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000000de0c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu+0x59/0x70
 rcu_exp_wait_wake+0x54e/0x870
 ? sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus+0x1fc/0x390
 process_one_work+0x1ef/0x3c0
 ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
 worker_thread+0x28/0x3c0
 ? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
 kthread+0x115/0x140
 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
---[ end trace c5bf75eb6aa80bc6 ]---

This commit therefore avoids invoking tick_dep_set_cpu() on offlined
CPUs to limit both futility and false-positive splats.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -507,7 +507,10 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_expedited_wa
 				if (rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp)
 					continue;
 				rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp = true;
-				tick_dep_set_cpu(cpu, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP);
+				preempt_disable();
+				if (cpu_online(cpu))
+					tick_dep_set_cpu(cpu, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP);
+				preempt_enable();
 			}
 		}
 		j = READ_ONCE(jiffies_till_first_fqs);