All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Grant B Adams <nemith592@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
	Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix tps65217-charger vs vbus irq conflict
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:35:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230905063555.GZ11676@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823085430.6610-1-nemith592@gmail.com>

* Grant B Adams <nemith592@gmail.com> [230823 08:54]:
> Both the tps65217-charger and vbus drivers are trying to allocate the same
> TPS65217 device interrupt line (TPS65217 is a TI power management IC) 
> which results in the following error and a probe failure:
> 
> genirq: Flags mismatch irq 148. 00002000 (vbus) vs. 00000000 
> (tps65217-charger)
> 
> For the Beaglebone Black's config the tps65217-charger driver is currently
> disabled and therefore no conflict. Based on comments from Robert C Nelson
> this driver has been disabled for a long time and he is uncertain on the
> reasons why it was disabled. With a battery connected to the BBB, I 
> re-enabled the tps65217-charger driver which resulted in the 
> abovementioned.
> 
> The conflict is resolved by changing both driver's threaded interrupt
> request function from IRQF_ONESHOT to IRQF_SHARED.

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-23  8:54 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix tps65217-charger vs vbus irq conflict Grant B Adams
2023-08-23  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] power: supply: " Grant B Adams
2023-09-15 20:43   ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-08-23  8:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: musb: dsps: Fix vbus vs tps65217-charger " Grant B Adams
2023-09-05  6:35 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230905063555.GZ11676@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=b-liu@ti.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nemith592@gmail.com \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.