From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Subject: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for missed counts of perf event link kprobe
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:13:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230907071311.254313-8-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907071311.254313-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Adding test that puts kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls
bpf_kfunc_common_test kfunc, which has also kprobe on.
The latter won't get triggered due to kprobe recursion check
and kprobe missed counter is incremented.
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 5 ++
.../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 2 +
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c | 30 ++++++++++++
4 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index cefc5dd72573..a5e246f7b202 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it)
it->cnt = 0;
}
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_common_test(void)
+{
+}
+
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 {
int a;
};
@@ -343,6 +347,7 @@ BTF_SET8_START(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new, KF_ITER_NEW)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_common_test)
BTF_SET8_END(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_set = {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index f5c5b1375c24..7c664dd61059 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -104,4 +104,6 @@ void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1(struct prog_test_fail1 *p);
void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail2(struct prog_test_fail2 *p);
void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3(struct prog_test_fail3 *p);
void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1(void *mem, int len);
+
+void bpf_kfunc_common_test(void) __ksym;
#endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fc674258c81f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/missed.c
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "missed_kprobe.skel.h"
+
+/*
+ * Putting kprobe on bpf_fentry_test1 that calls bpf_kfunc_common_test
+ * kfunc, which has also kprobe on. The latter won't get triggered due
+ * to kprobe recursion check and kprobe missed counter is incremented.
+ */
+static void test_missed_perf_kprobe(void)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ struct bpf_link_info info = {};
+ struct missed_kprobe *skel;
+ __u32 len = sizeof(info);
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ skel = missed_kprobe__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "missed_kprobe__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = missed_kprobe__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "missed_kprobe__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.trigger);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_run");
+
+ err = bpf_link_get_info_by_fd(bpf_link__fd(skel->links.test2), &info, &len);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_link_get_info_by_fd"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.type, BPF_LINK_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, "info.type");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.type, BPF_PERF_EVENT_KPROBE, "info.perf_event.type");
+ ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.missed, 1, "info.perf_event.kprobe.missed");
+
+cleanup:
+ missed_kprobe__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void serial_test_missed(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("perf_kprobe"))
+ test_missed_perf_kprobe();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7f9ef701f5de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/missed_kprobe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/*
+ * No tests in here, just to trigger 'bpf_fentry_test*'
+ * through tracing test_run
+ */
+SEC("fentry/bpf_modify_return_test")
+int BPF_PROG(trigger)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int test1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_common_test();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("kprobe/bpf_kfunc_common_test")
+int test2(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-07 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-07 7:13 [PATCHv2 bpf-next 0/9] bpf: Add missed stats for kprobes Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 1/9] bpf: Count stats for kprobe_multi programs Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:09 ` Song Liu
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 2/9] bpf: Add missed value to kprobe_multi link info Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:15 ` Song Liu
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 3/9] bpf: Add missed value to kprobe perf " Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:40 ` Song Liu
2023-09-08 11:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-08 16:49 ` Song Liu
2023-09-10 18:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-08 23:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-08 23:32 ` Song Liu
2023-09-08 23:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-10 18:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 4/9] bpf: Count missed stats in trace_call_bpf Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:46 ` Song Liu
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/9] bpftool: Display missed count for kprobe_multi link Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 6/9] bpftool: Display missed count for kprobe perf link Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2023-09-07 18:52 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for missed counts of perf event link kprobe Song Liu
2023-09-08 23:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-09-10 18:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for recursion " Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 18:55 ` Song Liu
2023-09-14 7:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 7:13 ` [PATCHv2 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for recursion counts of perf event link tracepoint Jiri Olsa
2023-09-07 19:00 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230907071311.254313-8-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.