From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Zi Yan <zi.yan@sent.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/compaction: add support for >0 order folio memory compaction.
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:19:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309131044.fMW8Zabt-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230912162815.440749-2-zi.yan@sent.com>
Hi Zi,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.6-rc1 next-20230912]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Zi-Yan/mm-compaction-add-support-for-0-order-folio-memory-compaction/20230913-003027
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912162815.440749-2-zi.yan%40sent.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/compaction: add support for >0 order folio memory compaction.
config: i386-randconfig-r006-20230913 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230913/202309131044.fMW8Zabt-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230913/202309131044.fMW8Zabt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309131044.fMW8Zabt-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> mm/compaction.c:135:13: warning: 'sort_free_pages' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
135 | static void sort_free_pages(struct list_head *src, struct free_list *dst)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> mm/compaction.c:110:22: warning: 'release_free_list' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
110 | static unsigned long release_free_list(struct free_list *freepages)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/sort_free_pages +135 mm/compaction.c
109
> 110 static unsigned long release_free_list(struct free_list *freepages)
111 {
112 int order;
113 unsigned long high_pfn = 0;
114
115 for (order = 0; order <= MAX_ORDER; order++) {
116 struct page *page, *next;
117
118 list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, &freepages[order].pages, lru) {
119 unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
120
121 list_del(&page->lru);
122 /*
123 * Convert free pages into post allocation pages, so
124 * that we can free them via __free_page.
125 */
126 post_alloc_hook(page, order, __GFP_MOVABLE);
127 __free_pages(page, order);
128 if (pfn > high_pfn)
129 high_pfn = pfn;
130 }
131 }
132 return high_pfn;
133 }
134
> 135 static void sort_free_pages(struct list_head *src, struct free_list *dst)
136 {
137 unsigned int order;
138 struct page *page, *next;
139
140 list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, src, lru) {
141 order = buddy_order(page);
142
143 list_move(&page->lru, &dst[order].pages);
144 dst[order].nr_free++;
145 }
146 }
147
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 16:28 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Enable >0 order folio memory compaction Zi Yan
2023-09-12 16:28 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/compaction: add support for " Zi Yan
2023-09-12 17:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-09-12 17:38 ` Zi Yan
2023-09-13 3:19 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-09-15 9:33 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-18 17:06 ` Zi Yan
2023-10-10 8:07 ` Huang, Ying
2023-09-12 16:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/compaction: optimize >0 order folio compaction with free page split Zi Yan
2023-09-18 7:34 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-18 17:20 ` Zi Yan
2023-09-20 8:15 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-12 16:28 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/compaction: optimize >0 order folio compaction by sorting source pages Zi Yan
2023-09-12 17:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-09-12 20:31 ` Zi Yan
2023-09-13 8:19 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-12 16:28 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios Zi Yan
2023-09-15 9:41 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-18 17:17 ` Zi Yan
2023-09-20 14:44 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-21 0:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Enable >0 order folio memory compaction Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-21 1:16 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-21 2:05 ` John Hubbard
2023-09-21 3:14 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-21 15:56 ` Zi Yan
2023-10-02 12:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-09 13:24 ` Zi Yan
2023-10-09 14:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-09 15:42 ` Zi Yan
2023-10-09 15:52 ` Zi Yan
2023-10-10 10:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-09 7:12 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-09 13:43 ` Zi Yan
2023-10-10 6:08 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-10 16:48 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309131044.fMW8Zabt-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zi.yan@sent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.