All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	oleg@redhat.com, giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com,
	gerg@uclinux.org, ben.wolsieffer@hefring.com,
	Ben.Wolsieffer@hefring.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-hotfixes-stable] proc-nommu-proc-pid-maps-release-mmap-read-lock.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:22:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230919202214.4D00AC433C7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: proc: nommu: /proc/<pid>/maps: release mmap read lock
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     proc-nommu-proc-pid-maps-release-mmap-read-lock.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Ben Wolsieffer <Ben.Wolsieffer@hefring.com>
Subject: proc: nommu: /proc/<pid>/maps: release mmap read lock
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:30:20 -0400

The no-MMU implementation of /proc/<pid>/map doesn't normally release
the mmap read lock, because it uses !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_vml) to determine
whether to release the lock.  Since _vml is NULL when the end of the
mappings is reached, the lock is not released.

Reading /proc/1/maps twice doesn't cause a hang because it only
takes the read lock, which can be taken multiple times and therefore
doesn't show any problem if the lock isn't released. Instead, you need
to perform some operation that attempts to take the write lock after
reading /proc/<pid>/maps. To actually reproduce the bug, compile the
following code as 'proc_maps_bug':

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
        void *buf;
        sleep(1);
        buf = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
        puts("mmap returned");
        return 0;
}

Then, run:

  ./proc_maps_bug &; cat /proc/$!/maps; fg

Without this patch, mmap() will hang and the command will never
complete.
	
This code was incorrectly adapted from the MMU implementation, which at
the time released the lock in m_next() before returning the last entry.

The MMU implementation has diverged further from the no-MMU version since
then, so this patch brings their locking and error handling into sync,
fixing the bug and hopefully avoiding similar issues in the future.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230914163019.4050530-2-ben.wolsieffer@hefring.com
Fixes: 47fecca15c09 ("fs/proc/task_nommu.c: don't use priv->task->mm")
Signed-off-by: Ben Wolsieffer <ben.wolsieffer@hefring.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/proc/task_nommu.c |   27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c~proc-nommu-proc-pid-maps-release-mmap-read-lock
+++ a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
@@ -192,11 +192,16 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m,
 		return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
 
 	mm = priv->mm;
-	if (!mm || !mmget_not_zero(mm))
+	if (!mm || !mmget_not_zero(mm)) {
+		put_task_struct(priv->task);
+		priv->task = NULL;
 		return NULL;
+	}
 
 	if (mmap_read_lock_killable(mm)) {
 		mmput(mm);
+		put_task_struct(priv->task);
+		priv->task = NULL;
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
 	}
 
@@ -205,23 +210,21 @@ static void *m_start(struct seq_file *m,
 	if (vma)
 		return vma;
 
-	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
-	mmput(mm);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void m_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *_vml)
+static void m_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	struct proc_maps_private *priv = m->private;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = priv->mm;
 
-	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_vml)) {
-		mmap_read_unlock(priv->mm);
-		mmput(priv->mm);
-	}
-	if (priv->task) {
-		put_task_struct(priv->task);
-		priv->task = NULL;
-	}
+	if (!priv->task)
+		return;
+
+	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
+	mmput(mm);
+	put_task_struct(priv->task);
+	priv->task = NULL;
 }
 
 static void *m_next(struct seq_file *m, void *_p, loff_t *pos)
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from Ben.Wolsieffer@hefring.com are



                 reply	other threads:[~2023-09-19 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230919202214.4D00AC433C7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben.wolsieffer@hefring.com \
    --cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
    --cc=giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.