[PATCH 4.19 077/273] quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit dabc8b20756601b9e1cc85a81d47d3f98ed4d13a ]

The dquot_mark_dquot_dirty() using dquot references from the inode
should be protected by dquot_srcu. quota_off code takes care to call
synchronize_srcu(&dquot_srcu) to not drop dquot references while they
are used by other users. But dquot_transfer() breaks this assumption.
We call dquot_transfer() to drop the last reference of dquot and add
it to free_dquots, but there may still be other users using the dquot
at this time, as shown in the function graph below:

       cpu1              cpu2
_________________|_________________
wb_do_writeback         CHOWN(1)
 ...
  ext4_da_update_reserve_space
   dquot_claim_block
    ...
     dquot_mark_dquot_dirty // try to dirty old quota
      test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags) // still ACTIVE
      if (test_bit(DQ_MOD_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
      // test no dirty, wait dq_list_lock
                    ...
                     dquot_transfer
                      __dquot_transfer
                      dqput_all(transfer_from) // rls old dquot
                       dqput // last dqput
                        dquot_release
                         clear_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags)
                        atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count)
                        put_dquot_last(dquot)
                         list_add_tail(&dquot->dq_free, &free_dquots)
                         // add the dquot to free_dquots
      if (!test_and_set_bit(DQ_MOD_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
        add dqi_dirty_list // add released dquot to dirty_list

This can cause various issues, such as dquot being destroyed by
dqcache_shrink_scan() after being added to free_dquots, which can trigger
a UAF in dquot_mark_dquot_dirty(); or after dquot is added to free_dquots
and then to dirty_list, it is added to free_dquots again after
dquot_writeback_dquots() is executed, which causes the free_dquots list to
be corrupted and triggers a UAF when dqcache_shrink_scan() is called for
freeing dquot twice.

As Honza said, we need to fix dquot_transfer() to follow the guarantees
dquot_srcu should provide. But calling synchronize_srcu() directly from
dquot_transfer() is too expensive (and mostly unnecessary). So we add
dquot whose last reference should be dropped to the new global dquot
list releasing_dquots, and then queue work item which would call
synchronize_srcu() and after that perform the final cleanup of all the
dquots on releasing_dquots.

Fixes: 4580b30ea887 ("quota: Do not dirty bad dquots")
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230630110822.3881712-5-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/quota/dquot.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
index 273971b4060d6..82af42717ef88 100644
--- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
+++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
@@ -223,13 +223,22 @@ static void put_quota_format(struct quota_format_type *fmt)
 
 /*
  * Dquot List Management:
- * The quota code uses four lists for dquot management: the inuse_list,
- * free_dquots, dqi_dirty_list, and dquot_hash[] array. A single dquot
- * structure may be on some of those lists, depending on its current state.
+ * The quota code uses five lists for dquot management: the inuse_list,
+ * releasing_dquots, free_dquots, dqi_dirty_list, and dquot_hash[] array.
+ * A single dquot structure may be on some of those lists, depending on
+ * its current state.
  *
  * All dquots are placed to the end of inuse_list when first created, and this
  * list is used for invalidate operation, which must look at every dquot.
  *
+ * When the last reference of a dquot will be dropped, the dquot will be
+ * added to releasing_dquots. We'd then queue work item which would call
+ * synchronize_srcu() and after that perform the final cleanup of all the
+ * dquots on the list. Both releasing_dquots and free_dquots use the
+ * dq_free list_head in the dquot struct. When a dquot is removed from
+ * releasing_dquots, a reference count is always subtracted, and if
+ * dq_count == 0 at that point, the dquot will be added to the free_dquots.
+ *
  * Unused dquots (dq_count == 0) are added to the free_dquots list when freed,
  * and this list is searched whenever we need an available dquot.  Dquots are
  * removed from the list as soon as they are used again, and
@@ -248,6 +257,7 @@ static void put_quota_format(struct quota_format_type *fmt)
 
 static LIST_HEAD(inuse_list);
 static LIST_HEAD(free_dquots);
+static LIST_HEAD(releasing_dquots);
 static unsigned int dq_hash_bits, dq_hash_mask;
 static struct hlist_head *dquot_hash;
 
@@ -258,6 +268,9 @@ static qsize_t inode_get_rsv_space(struct inode *inode);
 static qsize_t __inode_get_rsv_space(struct inode *inode);
 static int __dquot_initialize(struct inode *inode, int type);
 
+static void quota_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
+static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(quota_release_work, quota_release_workfn);
+
 static inline unsigned int
 hashfn(const struct super_block *sb, struct kqid qid)
 {
@@ -305,12 +318,18 @@ static inline void put_dquot_last(struct dquot *dquot)
 	dqstats_inc(DQST_FREE_DQUOTS);
 }
 
+static inline void put_releasing_dquots(struct dquot *dquot)
+{
+	list_add_tail(&dquot->dq_free, &releasing_dquots);
+}
+
 static inline void remove_free_dquot(struct dquot *dquot)
 {
 	if (list_empty(&dquot->dq_free))
 		return;
 	list_del_init(&dquot->dq_free);
-	dqstats_dec(DQST_FREE_DQUOTS);
+	if (!atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count))
+		dqstats_dec(DQST_FREE_DQUOTS);
 }
 
 static inline void put_inuse(struct dquot *dquot)
@@ -542,6 +561,8 @@ static void invalidate_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int type)
 	struct dquot *dquot, *tmp;
 
 restart:
+	flush_delayed_work(&quota_release_work);
+
 	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dquot, tmp, &inuse_list, dq_inuse) {
 		if (dquot->dq_sb != sb)
@@ -550,6 +571,12 @@ static void invalidate_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int type)
 			continue;
 		/* Wait for dquot users */
 		if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count)) {
+			/* dquot in releasing_dquots, flush and retry */
+			if (!list_empty(&dquot->dq_free)) {
+				spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+				goto restart;
+			}
+
 			atomic_inc(&dquot->dq_count);
 			spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
 			/*
@@ -760,6 +787,49 @@ static struct shrinker dqcache_shrinker = {
 	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
 };
 
+/*
+ * Safely release dquot and put reference to dquot.
+ */
+static void quota_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct dquot *dquot;
+	struct list_head rls_head;
+
+	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
+	/* Exchange the list head to avoid livelock. */
+	list_replace_init(&releasing_dquots, &rls_head);
+	spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+
+restart:
+	synchronize_srcu(&dquot_srcu);
+	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
+	while (!list_empty(&rls_head)) {
+		dquot = list_first_entry(&rls_head, struct dquot, dq_free);
+		/* Dquot got used again? */
+		if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count) > 1) {
+			remove_free_dquot(dquot);
+			atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count);
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (dquot_dirty(dquot)) {
+			spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+			/* Commit dquot before releasing */
+			dquot_write_dquot(dquot);
+			goto restart;
+		}
+		if (dquot_active(dquot)) {
+			spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+			dquot->dq_sb->dq_op->release_dquot(dquot);
+			goto restart;
+		}
+		/* Dquot is inactive and clean, now move it to free list */
+		remove_free_dquot(dquot);
+		atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count);
+		put_dquot_last(dquot);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+}
+
 /*
  * Put reference to dquot
  */
@@ -776,7 +846,7 @@ void dqput(struct dquot *dquot)
 	}
 #endif
 	dqstats_inc(DQST_DROPS);
-we_slept:
+
 	spin_lock(&dq_list_lock);
 	if (atomic_read(&dquot->dq_count) > 1) {
 		/* We have more than one user... nothing to do */
@@ -788,25 +858,15 @@ void dqput(struct dquot *dquot)
 		spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
 		return;
 	}
+
 	/* Need to release dquot? */
-	if (dquot_dirty(dquot)) {
-		spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
-		/* Commit dquot before releasing */
-		dquot_write_dquot(dquot);
-		goto we_slept;
-	}
-	if (dquot_active(dquot)) {
-		spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
-		dquot->dq_sb->dq_op->release_dquot(dquot);
-		goto we_slept;
-	}
-	atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count);
 #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA_DEBUG
 	/* sanity check */
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&dquot->dq_free));
 #endif
-	put_dquot_last(dquot);
+	put_releasing_dquots(dquot);
 	spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock);
+	queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &quota_release_work, 1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dqput);
 
-- 
2.40.1