From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E431947B for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 21:43:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1695332587; x=1726868587; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9xjQ/Bm9dQGZSHv6qNNuTwUBSdSU1lkrE5hXszWoIIw=; b=gKgf55/faPeWu5caVr7GvV8+QUS6vKAM+iTS5P25fJ5+YNnaIXDr8yWL i7RagBG6zDa32xCEM7N8BRjj4c/NdiH+PMkBOWYTwaUHu1HZFzoh7kXSU Uy++Z2K1HHz4maN1SOIA2+Hrh4RUIKZqhn5JBNYiEFmgQs+kL8OD+goGI 0R4C0gqQBw+hCS/BgJ1hmorzh03ZthBzsm8zKhI2WI31ncwr1U0PaJcaP vUjIskwCb8Qd4aUwNrrJgiHRfGrEi5MCGJwMLZbP/FxVgRm4EOUyLor3s 8+aWUG3RBz18OHo+i8C3jPoDjlWDwh+xBkqBfNxl1oEne/ceSIJUV7Nyy A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10840"; a="447153452" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,166,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="447153452" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Sep 2023 14:43:02 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10840"; a="740847709" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,166,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="740847709" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b77866e22201) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2023 14:43:01 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b77866e22201 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qjRRr-0000RH-0E; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 21:42:59 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 05:42:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kairui Song Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] workingset: simplify and use a more intuitive model Message-ID: <202309220558.JSUOlHbi-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230920190244.16839-2-ryncsn@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230920190244.16839-2-ryncsn@gmail.com> Hi Kairui, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v6.6-rc2 next-20230921] [cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kairui-Song/workingset-simplify-and-use-a-more-intuitive-model/20230921-030515 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920190244.16839-2-ryncsn%40gmail.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH v3 1/6] workingset: simplify and use a more intuitive model config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20230921 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230922/202309220558.JSUOlHbi-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230922/202309220558.JSUOlHbi-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309220558.JSUOlHbi-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> mm/workingset.c:345:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'workingset_age_nonresident' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/workingset.c:724:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'shadow_lru_isolate' - different lock contexts for basic block -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki