From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Xu Senmiao <xusenmiao@huawei.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] ipneigh01.sh: Fix an issue where ipneigh01_arp test case fail due to ARP timeout
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:10:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230922091059.GB483490@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815085706.1077725-1-xusenmiao@huawei.com>
Hi Xu,
> When the ARP status of the rhost is stale,
> lhost ping rhost and the lhost deletes the ARP record,
> the record in the rhost changes from stale to delay.
> Then, the probe request is sent to the lhost, and the lhost ARP information is updated.
> rhost(10.0.0.1) lhost(10.0.0.2)
> t1 10.0.0.2 STALE ping 10.0.0.1
> 10.0.0.1 REACHABLE
> arp -d 10.0.0.1
> t2 10.0.0.2 DELAY
> t3 probe 10.0.0.2
> t4 10.0.0.1 REACHABLE
> Clear the ARP entries of rhost before each round of test.
Do you have idea why ARP status of the rhost is stale?
I've never encountered problem like this.
> Signed-off-by: Xu Senmiao <xusenmiao@huawei.com>
> ---
> testcases/network/tcp_cmds/ipneigh/ipneigh01.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> diff --git a/testcases/network/tcp_cmds/ipneigh/ipneigh01.sh b/testcases/network/tcp_cmds/ipneigh/ipneigh01.sh
> index e67ff5cc8..4db675f8f 100755
> --- a/testcases/network/tcp_cmds/ipneigh/ipneigh01.sh
> +++ b/testcases/network/tcp_cmds/ipneigh/ipneigh01.sh
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ do_test()
> tst_res TINFO "stress auto-creation $entry_name cache entry deleted with '$CMD' $NUMLOOPS times"
> for i in $(seq 1 $NUMLOOPS); do
> + tst_rhost_run -c "arp -d $(tst_ipaddr lhost)"
IMHO we use $DEL_CMD as we use later in the test function, because some systems
does not have arp installed. i.e. use the tool which is used for testing.
Otherwise we endup with: sh: arp: command not found
Kind regards,
Petr
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-15 8:57 [LTP] [PATCH] ipneigh01.sh: Fix an issue where ipneigh01_arp test case fail due to ARP timeout Xu Senmiao via ltp
2023-09-22 9:10 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230922091059.GB483490@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=xusenmiao@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.