From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] reset: Annotate struct reset_control_array with __counted_by
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:52:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230922175229.work.838-kees@kernel.org> (raw)
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
(for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
functions).
As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct reset_control_array.
Additionally, since the element count member must be set before accessing
the annotated flexible array member, move its initialization earlier.
[1] https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
drivers/reset/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
index f0a076e94118..7ece6a8e9858 100644
--- a/drivers/reset/core.c
+++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ struct reset_control {
struct reset_control_array {
struct reset_control base;
unsigned int num_rstcs;
- struct reset_control *rstc[];
+ struct reset_control *rstc[] __counted_by(num_rstcs);
};
static const char *rcdev_name(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev)
@@ -1185,6 +1185,7 @@ of_reset_control_array_get(struct device_node *np, bool shared, bool optional,
resets = kzalloc(struct_size(resets, rstc, num), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!resets)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ resets->num_rstcs = num;
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
rstc = __of_reset_control_get(np, NULL, i, shared, optional,
@@ -1193,7 +1194,6 @@ of_reset_control_array_get(struct device_node *np, bool shared, bool optional,
goto err_rst;
resets->rstc[i] = rstc;
}
- resets->num_rstcs = num;
resets->base.array = true;
return &resets->base;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 17:52 Kees Cook [this message]
2023-09-23 16:35 ` [PATCH] reset: Annotate struct reset_control_array with __counted_by Gustavo A. R. Silva
2023-10-24 21:18 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230922175229.work.838-kees@kernel.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.