All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/11] gpiolib: replace find_chip_by_name() with gpio_device_find_by_label()
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 16:29:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927142931.19798-8-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927142931.19798-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Remove all remaining uses of find_chip_by_name() (and subsequently:
gpiochip_find()) from gpiolib.c and use the new
gpio_device_find_by_label() instead.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index e26cbd10a246..dcdac508dcd4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1145,18 +1145,6 @@ struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find_by_label(const char *label)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpio_device_find_by_label);
 
-static int gpiochip_match_name(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
-{
-	const char *name = data;
-
-	return !strcmp(gc->label, name);
-}
-
-static struct gpio_chip *find_chip_by_name(const char *name)
-{
-	return gpiochip_find((void *)name, gpiochip_match_name);
-}
-
 /**
  * gpio_device_get() - Increase the reference count of this GPIO device
  * @gdev: GPIO device to increase the refcount for
@@ -3908,7 +3896,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_remove_lookup_table);
  */
 void gpiod_add_hogs(struct gpiod_hog *hogs)
 {
-	struct gpio_chip *gc;
 	struct gpiod_hog *hog;
 
 	mutex_lock(&gpio_machine_hogs_mutex);
@@ -3920,9 +3907,10 @@ void gpiod_add_hogs(struct gpiod_hog *hogs)
 		 * The chip may have been registered earlier, so check if it
 		 * exists and, if so, try to hog the line now.
 		 */
-		gc = find_chip_by_name(hog->chip_label);
-		if (gc)
-			gpiochip_machine_hog(gc, hog);
+		struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) =
+				gpio_device_find_by_label(hog->chip_label);
+		if (gdev)
+			gpiochip_machine_hog(gpio_device_get_chip(gdev), hog);
 	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&gpio_machine_hogs_mutex);
@@ -3977,14 +3965,13 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 	struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 	struct gpiod_lookup_table *table;
 	struct gpiod_lookup *p;
+	struct gpio_chip *gc;
 
 	table = gpiod_find_lookup_table(dev);
 	if (!table)
 		return desc;
 
 	for (p = &table->table[0]; p->key; p++) {
-		struct gpio_chip *gc;
-
 		/* idx must always match exactly */
 		if (p->idx != idx)
 			continue;
@@ -4005,9 +3992,9 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 			return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 		}
 
-		gc = find_chip_by_name(p->key);
-
-		if (!gc) {
+		struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) =
+					gpio_device_find_by_label(p->key);
+		if (!gdev) {
 			/*
 			 * As the lookup table indicates a chip with
 			 * p->key should exist, assume it may
@@ -4020,6 +4007,8 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 			return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
 		}
 
+		gc = gpio_device_get_chip(gdev);
+
 		if (gc->ngpio <= p->chip_hwnum) {
 			dev_err(dev,
 				"requested GPIO %u (%u) is out of range [0..%u] for chip %s\n",
@@ -4028,7 +4017,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
 			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 		}
 
-		desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, p->chip_hwnum);
+		desc = gpio_device_get_desc(gdev, p->chip_hwnum);
 		*flags = p->flags;
 
 		return desc;
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-27 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-27 14:29 [PATCH v4 00/11] gpiolib: work towards removing gpiochip_find() Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] gpiolib: make gpio_device_get() and gpio_device_put() public Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-02  9:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] gpiolib: add support for scope-based management to gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-02  9:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find() Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-02  9:42   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-02  9:52     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-02  9:57       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-02  9:59         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_label() Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-02  9:44   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-02  9:53     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-03 12:44       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-02  9:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-02  9:54     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-02  9:58       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] gpiolib: reluctantly provide gpio_device_get_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 14:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] gpio: of: replace gpiochip_find_* with gpio_device_find_* Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] gpio: acpi: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find() Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] gpio: swnode: replace gpiochip_find() with gpio_device_find_by_label() Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] gpio: sysfs: drop the mention of gpiochip_find() from sysfs code Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-04 11:58 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] gpiolib: work towards removing gpiochip_find() Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230927142931.19798-8-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.