All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>,
	Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the rdma-fixes tree
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:59:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230928095916.GS1642130@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230928113851.5197a1ec@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:38:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   374012b00457 ("RDMA/mlx5: Fix mkey cache possible deadlock on cleanup")
> 
> from the rdma-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>   57e7071683ef ("RDMA/mlx5: Implement mkeys management via LIFO queue")
> 
> from the rdma tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> index 433f96459246,b0fa2d644973..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> @@@ -1025,21 -998,15 +999,21 @@@ void mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup(struct mlx
>   	if (!dev->cache.wq)
>   		return;
>   
>  -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->cache.remove_ent_dwork);
>   	mutex_lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock);
>  +	dev->cache.disable = true;
>   	for (node = rb_first(root); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
>   		ent = rb_entry(node, struct mlx5_cache_ent, node);
> - 		xa_lock_irq(&ent->mkeys);
> + 		spin_lock_irq(&ent->mkeys_queue.lock);
>   		ent->disabled = true;
> - 		xa_unlock_irq(&ent->mkeys);
> + 		spin_unlock_irq(&ent->mkeys_queue.lock);
>  -		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ent->dwork);
>   	}
>  +	mutex_unlock(&dev->cache.rb_lock);
>  +
>  +	/*
>  +	 * After all entries are disabled and will not reschedule on WQ,
>  +	 * flush it and all async commands.
>  +	 */
>  +	flush_workqueue(dev->cache.wq);
>   
>   	mlx5_mkey_cache_debugfs_cleanup(dev);
>   	mlx5_cmd_cleanup_async_ctx(&dev->async_ctx);

Thanks for the fix.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-28  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28  1:38 linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the rdma-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-28  9:59 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-06  1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-06 10:24 ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-03-06 11:35   ` Zhu Yanjun
     [not found] ` <4d66668a-ff8e-48f6-a5e3-98ada08c5037@linux.dev>
2025-03-06 20:33   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-06  0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-30  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-01 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23  2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-23 15:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-07-10  1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-10  5:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-06-27  0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-27  5:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-05-01  0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-01  0:55 ` Doug Ledford
2018-05-02 10:22   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-05-02 14:00     ` Doug Ledford
2018-05-02 17:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-03-22  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  1:51 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  1:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  3:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230928095916.GS1642130@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelgur@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.