From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Cc: jreuter@yaina.de, ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ax25: Fix potential deadlock on &ax25_list_lock
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 18:14:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230930161434.GC92317@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230926105732.10864-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:57:32AM +0000, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> Timer interrupt ax25_ds_timeout() could introduce double locks on
> &ax25_list_lock.
>
> ax25_ioctl()
> --> ax25_ctl_ioctl()
> --> ax25_dama_off()
> --> ax25_dev_dama_off()
> --> ax25_check_dama_slave()
> --> spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock)
> <timer interrupt>
> --> ax25_ds_timeout()
> --> spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock)
>
> This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
> developing for irq-related deadlock.
>
> To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch use spin_lock_bh()
> on &ax25_list_lock inside ax25_check_dama_slave().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Hi Chengfeng Ye,
thanks for your patch.
As a fix for Networking this should probably be targeted at the
'net' tree. Which should be denoted in the subject.
Subject: [PATCH net] ...
And as a fix this patch should probably have a Fixes tag.
This ones seem appropriate to me, but I could be wrong.
Fixes: c070e51db5e2 ("ice: always add legacy 32byte RXDID in supported_rxdids")
I don't think it is necessary to repost just to address these issues,
but the Networking maintainers may think otherwise.
The code change itself looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
> index f00e27df3c76..010b11303d32 100644
> --- a/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
> +++ b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
> @@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ static int ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
> ax25_cb *ax25;
> int res = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
> + spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
> ax25_for_each(ax25, &ax25_list)
> if (ax25->ax25_dev == ax25_dev && (ax25->condition & AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE) && ax25->state > AX25_STATE_1) {
> res = 1;
> break;
> }
> - spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
>
> return res;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-30 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 10:57 [PATCH] ax25: Fix potential deadlock on &ax25_list_lock Chengfeng Ye
2023-09-30 16:14 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-10-04 17:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-05 7:25 ` Chengfeng Ye
2023-10-05 13:33 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230930161434.GC92317@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dg573847474@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jreuter@yaina.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.