Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] KERNEL_DEVICETREE: 32-bit re-org

[Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>]

On Tue 2023-10-03 @ 12:32:08 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
> 
> On 10/3/23 06:19, Trevor Woerner via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> > The upstream kernel reorganized the 32-bit arch/arm device-tree directory structure
> > to separate out the device-trees by manufacturer (similar to the organization
> > of the arch/arm64 device-trees). Update the references to 32-bit arm
> > device-trees to match.
> > 
> 
> Does this work with linux-yocto and linux-yocto-dev from master or do we
> need to add some logic to support both (do you want to?).

This doesn't work at all. I figured this was an easy one, made the tweak,
submitted it, then added it to my jenkins builder to verify overnight. Woke up
to find the do_image_wic() tasks failed. It's the same layout as the 64-bit
machines but I'll have to dig in to figure out why it didn't work.

As for the linux-yocto vs linux-yocto-dev question I'll take a look. This
happened with linux-yocto, so I would assume it is already the case with
linux-yocto-dev. But if oe-core supports multiple versions of linux-yocto,
that might be the tricky bit and yes, I would look into supporting both for
the time-being until the transition period ends.

Although... any BSP layer supporting 32-bit machines will have similar issues,
so perhaps there's a better way to solve this in oe-core?

Best regards,
	Trevor