From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 589C7E7C4E2 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:26:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=5fNvmPpSzt5A+iq/b2VnT/9CHRn/YFYNmsemPDb2Kwo=; b=vwNu95/FRKEKq2 7V/l/c8YklwvSpCY6g4FhRPZNnXQaL6Otao19DYgfd/BAU5d4WgvfB3QX/h1qpdALa/SH0UQhCUtg lY2w5IFrkIJB03AWHoAY1E8aUYYrUdPcP5UP3IFDaDo4LTtxBU2Xs9iKmcvlHnlF7TXbrwej7ZbKq zNIW1yhp0uDHg8OEiWVS9P3j7cGmiiTiXpmBCojNF3h/5vlaL0K5x0ei1GOLQZ10/tCSAMMOxI6OJ Dn4Bn2/ozOoD7LjFnhrepD+3XpRr1xEKwLxbZ2o1xb4awvjcdyoN25aFUoFYWw8bzVrYcijAF6pt2 W2mYQuzJltp2XLSNRggw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qo4hX-000Tol-1Y; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:26:19 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qo4hU-000To5-0h for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:26:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0986158A; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70BA5C433C9; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:26:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696436775; bh=qcglxAxRgYQIz8E0bCy+wEqQLr5U4t9luHiOQaUV2Fo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jxa2ZLLsxGRvLwcvTQldZ96adZlICmJQJRLEB/ssJiEoxmM9MPQTVgiIQ3XkDC7fM bdogyPB07dsycbtlyP2aSNKv6SPPCpDh9joLzDX0roO/N1X+uFhAFmbVoW6mpAf3qx lVNe3tqlHYazhWBRPb641wMYKdzKEOgrLArUd7/fPhLs6VplRj54mSUps/tOf9KoXO 0b2qnNSzPrqwl+tLXEuyhDgPH94MxcRn0W/pk/BLl985bNouApvERtFuaSgnqGOriS OuwBw5rcjYuoZ5+6Z2EkEHNSeIC3GKPDFMGFknU4z0Fx/sv5cNZHBttoIDdgrKtKlE CYTTNiuLLXwNw== Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 09:26:13 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Serge Semin Cc: Rohan G Thomas , "David S . Miller" , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: xgmac: EST interrupts handling Message-ID: <20231004092613.07cb393f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230923031031.21434-1-rohan.g.thomas@intel.com> <20231002135551.020f180c@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231004_092616_320653_EB5C4E05 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.65 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:12:15 +0300 Serge Semin wrote: > If I didn't miss some details after that we'll have a common EST > module utilized for both DW QoS Eth and DW XGMAC IP-cores. So the question now is whether we want Rohan to do this conversion _first_, in DW QoS 5, and then add xgmac part. Or the patch should go in as is and you'll follow up with the conversion? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B8CC1BDE3; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70BA5C433C9; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:26:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696436775; bh=qcglxAxRgYQIz8E0bCy+wEqQLr5U4t9luHiOQaUV2Fo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jxa2ZLLsxGRvLwcvTQldZ96adZlICmJQJRLEB/ssJiEoxmM9MPQTVgiIQ3XkDC7fM bdogyPB07dsycbtlyP2aSNKv6SPPCpDh9joLzDX0roO/N1X+uFhAFmbVoW6mpAf3qx lVNe3tqlHYazhWBRPb641wMYKdzKEOgrLArUd7/fPhLs6VplRj54mSUps/tOf9KoXO 0b2qnNSzPrqwl+tLXEuyhDgPH94MxcRn0W/pk/BLl985bNouApvERtFuaSgnqGOriS OuwBw5rcjYuoZ5+6Z2EkEHNSeIC3GKPDFMGFknU4z0Fx/sv5cNZHBttoIDdgrKtKlE CYTTNiuLLXwNw== Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 09:26:13 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Serge Semin Cc: Rohan G Thomas , "David S . Miller" , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: xgmac: EST interrupts handling Message-ID: <20231004092613.07cb393f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230923031031.21434-1-rohan.g.thomas@intel.com> <20231002135551.020f180c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:12:15 +0300 Serge Semin wrote: > If I didn't miss some details after that we'll have a common EST > module utilized for both DW QoS Eth and DW XGMAC IP-cores. So the question now is whether we want Rohan to do this conversion _first_, in DW QoS 5, and then add xgmac part. Or the patch should go in as is and you'll follow up with the conversion?