From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: shravan chippa <shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
Cc: green.wan@sifive.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nagasuresh.relli@microchip.com, praveen.kumar@microchip.com,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: dma: sf-pdma: add new compatible name
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:30:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231004133021.GB2743005-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231003042215.142678-3-shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:52:13AM +0530, shravan chippa wrote:
> From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
>
> Add new compatible name microchip,mpfs-pdma to support
> out of order dma transfers
>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
> index a1af0b906365..974467c4bacb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
> @@ -27,10 +27,14 @@ allOf:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - items:
> - - enum:
> - - sifive,fu540-c000-pdma
> - - const: sifive,pdma0
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: microchip,mpfs-pdma # Microchip out of order DMA transfer
> + - const: sifive,fu540-c000-pdma # Sifive in-order DMA transfer
This doesn't really make sense. microchip,mpfs-pdma is compatible with
sifive,fu540-c000-pdma and sifive,fu540-c000-pdma is compatible with
sifive,pdma0, but microchip,mpfs-pdma is not compatible with
sifive,pdma0? (Or replace "compatible with" with "a superset of")
Any fallback is only useful if an OS only understanding the fallback
will work with the h/w. Does this h/w work without the driver changes?
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: shravan chippa <shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
Cc: green.wan@sifive.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nagasuresh.relli@microchip.com, praveen.kumar@microchip.com,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: dma: sf-pdma: add new compatible name
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:30:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231004133021.GB2743005-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231003042215.142678-3-shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 09:52:13AM +0530, shravan chippa wrote:
> From: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
>
> Add new compatible name microchip,mpfs-pdma to support
> out of order dma transfers
>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shravan Chippa <shravan.chippa@microchip.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
> index a1af0b906365..974467c4bacb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml
> @@ -27,10 +27,14 @@ allOf:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - items:
> - - enum:
> - - sifive,fu540-c000-pdma
> - - const: sifive,pdma0
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: microchip,mpfs-pdma # Microchip out of order DMA transfer
> + - const: sifive,fu540-c000-pdma # Sifive in-order DMA transfer
This doesn't really make sense. microchip,mpfs-pdma is compatible with
sifive,fu540-c000-pdma and sifive,fu540-c000-pdma is compatible with
sifive,pdma0, but microchip,mpfs-pdma is not compatible with
sifive,pdma0? (Or replace "compatible with" with "a superset of")
Any fallback is only useful if an OS only understanding the fallback
will work with the h/w. Does this h/w work without the driver changes?
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-03 4:22 [PATCH v2 0/4] dma: sf-pdma: various sf-pdma updates for the mpfs platform shravan chippa
2023-10-03 4:22 ` shravan chippa
2023-10-03 4:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dmaengine: sf-pdma: Support of_dma_controller_register() shravan chippa
2023-10-03 4:22 ` shravan chippa
2023-10-03 7:36 ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-10-03 7:36 ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-10-17 18:33 ` Samuel Holland
2023-10-17 18:33 ` Samuel Holland
2023-10-18 9:16 ` Shravan.Chippa
2023-10-18 9:16 ` Shravan.Chippa
2023-10-03 4:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: dma: sf-pdma: add new compatible name shravan chippa
2023-10-03 4:22 ` shravan chippa
2023-10-04 13:30 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-10-04 13:30 ` Rob Herring
2023-10-05 10:54 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-05 10:54 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-12 9:22 ` Shravan.Chippa
2023-10-12 9:22 ` Shravan.Chippa
2023-10-12 9:35 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-12 9:35 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-17 17:42 ` Samuel Holland
2023-10-17 17:42 ` Samuel Holland
2023-10-03 4:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dmaengine: sf-pdma: add mpfs-pdma " shravan chippa
2023-10-03 4:22 ` shravan chippa
2023-10-03 7:35 ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-10-03 7:35 ` Emil Renner Berthing
2023-10-04 3:47 ` Shravan.Chippa
2023-10-04 3:47 ` Shravan.Chippa
2023-10-04 13:22 ` Rob Herring
2023-10-04 13:22 ` Rob Herring
2023-10-03 4:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] riscv: dts: microchip: add specific compatible for mpfs' pdma shravan chippa
2023-10-03 4:22 ` shravan chippa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231004133021.GB2743005-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=green.wan@sifive.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nagasuresh.relli@microchip.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=praveen.kumar@microchip.com \
--cc=shravan.chippa@microchip.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.