All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ardb@kernel.org, bertrand.marquis@arm.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, jgross@suse.com, kristina.martsenko@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	pcc@google.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 20/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING
Date: Thu,  5 Oct 2023 10:50:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231005095025.1872048-22-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231005095025.1872048-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>

In system_uses_irq_prio_masking() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check
for ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING, but this is not necessary and
alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable.

For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than
it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap
test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it
will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some
race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the
subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different
branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative
sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static
branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there
are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between
cpucap detection and alternative patching.

Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and
migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(),
or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will
remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make
it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and
after alternative patching.

When CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI=y the ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING cpucap is
a strict boot cpu feature which is detected and patched early on the
boot cpu, which both happen in smp_prepare_boot_cpu(). In the window
between the ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING cpucap is detected and
alternatives are patched we don't run any code that depends upon the
ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING cpucap:

* We leave DAIF.IF set until after boot alternatives are patched, and
  interrupts are unmasked later in init_IRQ(), so we cannot reach
  IRQ/FIQ entry code and will not use irqs_priority_unmasked().

* We don't call any code which uses arm_cpuidle_save_irq_context() and
  arm_cpuidle_restore_irq_context() during this window.

* We don't call start_thread_common() during this window.

* The local_irq_*() code in <asm/irqflags.h> depends solely on an
  alternative branch since commit:

  a5f61cc636f48bdf ("arm64: irqflags: use alternative branches for pseudo-NMI logic")

  ... and hence will use the default (DAIF-only) masking behaviour until
  alternatives are patched.

* Secondary CPUs are brought up later after alternatives are patched,
  and alternatives are patched on the boot CPU immediately prior to
  calling init_gic_priority_masking(), so we'll correctly initialize
  interrupt masking regardless.

This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with
alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which avoid generating code to test the
system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at
runtime. As this makes system_uses_irq_prio_masking() equivalent to
__irqflags_uses_pmr(), the latter is removed and replaced with the
former for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h   | 20 +++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index a91f940351fc3..c387ee4ee194e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline bool system_has_full_ptr_auth(void)
 
 static __always_inline bool system_uses_irq_prio_masking(void)
 {
-	return cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING);
+	return alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING);
 }
 
 static inline bool system_supports_mte(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
index 1f31ec146d161..0a7186a93882d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -21,12 +21,6 @@
  * exceptions should be unmasked.
  */
 
-static __always_inline bool __irqflags_uses_pmr(void)
-{
-	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) &&
-	       alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING);
-}
-
 static __always_inline void __daif_local_irq_enable(void)
 {
 	barrier();
@@ -49,7 +43,7 @@ static __always_inline void __pmr_local_irq_enable(void)
 
 static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
 {
-	if (__irqflags_uses_pmr()) {
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		__pmr_local_irq_enable();
 	} else {
 		__daif_local_irq_enable();
@@ -77,7 +71,7 @@ static __always_inline void __pmr_local_irq_disable(void)
 
 static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
 {
-	if (__irqflags_uses_pmr()) {
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		__pmr_local_irq_disable();
 	} else {
 		__daif_local_irq_disable();
@@ -99,7 +93,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __pmr_local_save_flags(void)
  */
 static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
 {
-	if (__irqflags_uses_pmr()) {
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		return __pmr_local_save_flags();
 	} else {
 		return __daif_local_save_flags();
@@ -118,7 +112,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __pmr_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
 
 static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
 {
-	if (__irqflags_uses_pmr()) {
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		return __pmr_irqs_disabled_flags(flags);
 	} else {
 		return __daif_irqs_disabled_flags(flags);
@@ -137,7 +131,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __pmr_irqs_disabled(void)
 
 static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
 {
-	if (__irqflags_uses_pmr()) {
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		return __pmr_irqs_disabled();
 	} else {
 		return __daif_irqs_disabled();
@@ -169,7 +163,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __pmr_local_irq_save(void)
 
 static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
 {
-	if (__irqflags_uses_pmr()) {
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		return __pmr_local_irq_save();
 	} else {
 		return __daif_local_irq_save();
@@ -196,7 +190,7 @@ static __always_inline void __pmr_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
  */
 static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
 {
-	if (__irqflags_uses_pmr()) {
+	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
 		__pmr_local_irq_restore(flags);
 	} else {
 		__daif_local_irq_restore(flags);
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-05  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-05  9:49 [PATCH v2 00/38] arm64: Remove cpus_have_const_cap() Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/38] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Initialize evtstrm after finalizing cpucaps Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/38] arm64/arm: xen: enlighten: Fix KPTI checks Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/38] arm64: Factor out cpucap definitions Mark Rutland
2023-10-05 12:29   ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/38] arm64: Add cpucap_is_possible() Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/38] arm64: Add cpus_have_final_boot_cap() Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/38] arm64: Rework setup_cpu_features() Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/38] arm64: Fixup user features at boot time Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/38] arm64: Split kpti_install_ng_mappings() Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/38] arm64: kvm: Use cpus_have_final_cap() explicitly Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/38] arm64: Explicitly save/restore CPACR when probing SVE and SME Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/38] arm64: use build-time assertions for cpucap ordering Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/38] arm64: Use " Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:49 ` [PATCH v2 12/38] arm64: Rename SVE/SME cpu_enable functions Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 13/38] arm64: Use a positive cpucap for FP/SIMD Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 14/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_{ADDRESS,GENERIC}_AUTH Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 15/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_ARMv8_4_TTL Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 16/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_BTI Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 17/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 18/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_CNP Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 19/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_DIT Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 21/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_PAN Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 22/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_EPAN Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 23/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_RNG Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 24/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_WFXT Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 25/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 26/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_MTE Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 27/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_SSBS Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 28/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_SPECTRE_V2 Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 29/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_{SVE,SME,SME2,FA64} Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 30/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 31/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_843419 Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 32/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_1542419 Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 33/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_1742098 Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 34/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_2645198 Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 35/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23154 Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 36/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_NVIDIA_CARMEL_CNP Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 37/38] arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI Mark Rutland
2023-10-05  9:50 ` [PATCH v2 38/38] arm64: Remove cpus_have_const_cap() Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231005095025.1872048-22-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.