From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Anil Altinay <aaltinay@google.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] apparmor: global buffers spin lock may get contended
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 13:18:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231006041837.GA17924@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31d6e8d6-0747-a282-746b-5c144a9970bb@canonical.com>
On (23/06/26 17:31), John Johansen wrote:
> On 6/26/23 16:33, Anil Altinay wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > I was wondering if you get a chance to work on patch v4. Please let me know if you need help with testing.
> >
>
> yeah, testing help is always much appreciated. I have a v4, and I am
> working on 3 alternate version to compare against, to help give a better
> sense if we can get away with simplifying or tweak the scaling.
>
> I should be able to post them out some time tonight.
Hi John,
Did you get a chance to post v4? I may be able to give it some testing
on our real-life case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-06 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 13:19 apparmor: global buffers spin lock may get contended Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-08-15 9:47 ` John Johansen
2022-10-28 9:34 ` John Johansen
2022-10-31 3:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-10-31 3:55 ` John Johansen
2022-10-31 4:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-02-17 0:03 ` John Johansen
2023-02-17 0:08 ` [PATCH v3] " John Johansen
2023-02-17 10:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-02-20 8:42 ` John Johansen
2023-02-21 21:27 ` Anil Altinay
2023-06-26 23:35 ` Anil Altinay
[not found] ` <CACCxZWO-+M-J_enENr7q1WDcu1U8vYFoytqJxAh=x-nuP268zA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-06-27 0:31 ` John Johansen
2023-10-06 4:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2023-10-17 9:21 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] apparmor: cache buffers on percpu list if there is lock, contention John Johansen
2023-10-17 9:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] " John Johansen
2023-10-17 9:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] apparmor: exponential backoff on cache buffer contention John Johansen
2023-10-17 9:25 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] apparmor: experiment with faster backoff on global buffer John Johansen
2023-10-17 9:26 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] apparmor: limit the number of buffers in percpu cache John Johansen
2023-10-26 5:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] apparmor: cache buffers on percpu list if there is lock, contention Sergey Senozhatsky
[not found] ` <20221030013028.3557-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-10-30 6:32 ` apparmor: global buffers spin lock may get contended John Johansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231006041837.GA17924@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=aaltinay@google.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.