From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-handle-shared-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 13:14:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231006201457.DB92CC433C7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm: handle shared faults under the VMA lock
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-handle-shared-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-handle-shared-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: mm: handle shared faults under the VMA lock
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 20:53:15 +0100
There are many implementations of ->fault and some of them depend on
mmap_lock being held. All vm_ops that implement ->map_pages() end up
calling filemap_fault(), which I have audited to be sure it does not rely
on mmap_lock. So (for now) key off ->map_pages existing as a flag to
indicate that it's safe to call ->fault while only holding the vma lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231006195318.4087158-4-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memory.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-handle-shared-faults-under-the-vma-lock
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -3045,6 +3045,21 @@ static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct
count_vm_event(PGREUSE);
}
+/*
+ * We could add a bitflag somewhere, but for now, we know that all
+ * vm_ops that have a ->map_pages have been audited and don't need
+ * the mmap_lock to be held.
+ */
+static inline vm_fault_t vmf_can_call_fault(const struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
+
+ if (vma->vm_ops->map_pages || !(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK))
+ return 0;
+ vma_end_read(vma);
+ return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+}
+
static vm_fault_t vmf_anon_prepare(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
@@ -4672,10 +4687,9 @@ static vm_fault_t do_shared_fault(struct
vm_fault_t ret, tmp;
struct folio *folio;
- if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) {
- vma_end_read(vma);
- return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
- }
+ ret = vmf_can_call_fault(vmf);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
ret = __do_fault(vmf);
if (unlikely(ret & (VM_FAULT_ERROR | VM_FAULT_NOPAGE | VM_FAULT_RETRY)))
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from willy@infradead.org are
mm-make-lock_folio_maybe_drop_mmap-vma-lock-aware.patch
mm-call-wp_page_copy-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-shared-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-cow-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-read-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch
mm-handle-write-faults-to-ro-pages-under-the-vma-lock.patch
iomap-hold-state_lock-over-call-to-ifs_set_range_uptodate.patch
iomap-protect-read_bytes_pending-with-the-state_lock.patch
mm-add-folio_end_read.patch
ext4-use-folio_end_read.patch
buffer-use-folio_end_read.patch
iomap-use-folio_end_read.patch
bitops-add-xor_unlock_is_negative_byte.patch
alpha-implement-xor_unlock_is_negative_byte.patch
m68k-implement-xor_unlock_is_negative_byte.patch
mips-implement-xor_unlock_is_negative_byte.patch
powerpc-implement-arch_xor_unlock_is_negative_byte-on-32-bit.patch
riscv-implement-xor_unlock_is_negative_byte.patch
s390-implement-arch_xor_unlock_is_negative_byte.patch
mm-delete-checks-for-xor_unlock_is_negative_byte.patch
mm-add-folio_xor_flags_has_waiters.patch
mm-make-__end_folio_writeback-return-void.patch
mm-use-folio_xor_flags_has_waiters-in-folio_end_writeback.patch
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-06 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-06 20:14 Andrew Morton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-27 15:58 + mm-handle-shared-faults-under-the-vma-lock.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231006201457.DB92CC433C7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.