All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Cc: 3chas3@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] atm: solos-pci: Fix potential deadlock on &tx_queue_lock
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 17:13:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231007151328.GD831234@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231005074917.65161-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:49:17AM +0000, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> As &card->tx_queue_lock is acquired under softirq context along the
> following call chain from solos_bh(), other acquisition of the same
> lock inside process context should disable at least bh to avoid double
> lock.
> 
> <deadlock #2>
> pclose()
> --> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock)
> <interrupt>
>    --> solos_bh()
>    --> fpga_tx()
>    --> spin_lock(&card->tx_queue_lock)
> 
> This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
> developing for irq-related deadlock.
> 
> To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_irqsave()
> on &card->tx_queue_lock under process context code consistently to
> prevent the possible deadlock scenario.
> 
> Fixes: 213e85d38912 ("solos-pci: clean up pclose() function")
> Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: add fix tag, and split into two patches

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-07 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-05  7:49 [PATCH v2 2/2] atm: solos-pci: Fix potential deadlock on &tx_queue_lock Chengfeng Ye
2023-10-07 15:13 ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231007151328.GD831234@kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dg573847474@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.