From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/1] ethtool: Fix mod state of verbose no_mask bitset
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 17:57:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231007155730.GF831234@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006141246.3747944-1-kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Köry Maincent wrote:
> From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
>
> A bitset without mask in a _SET request means we want exactly the bits in
> the bitset to be set. This works correctly for compact format but when
> verbose format is parsed, ethnl_update_bitset32_verbose() only sets the
> bits present in the request bitset but does not clear the rest. The commit
> 6699170376ab fixes this issue by clearing the whole target bitmap before we
> start iterating. The solution proposed brought an issue with the behavior
> of the mod variable. As the bitset is always cleared the old val will
> always differ to the new val.
>
> Fix it by adding a new temporary variable which save the state of the old
> bitmap.
>
> Fixes: 6699170376ab ("ethtool: fix application of verbose no_mask bitset")
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix the allocated size.
> ---
> net/ethtool/bitset.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ethtool/bitset.c b/net/ethtool/bitset.c
> index 0515d6604b3b..8a6b35c920cd 100644
> --- a/net/ethtool/bitset.c
> +++ b/net/ethtool/bitset.c
> @@ -432,7 +432,9 @@ ethnl_update_bitset32_verbose(u32 *bitmap, unsigned int nbits,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, bool *mod)
> {
> struct nlattr *bit_attr;
> + u32 *tmp = NULL;
> bool no_mask;
> + bool dummy;
> int rem;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -448,8 +450,16 @@ ethnl_update_bitset32_verbose(u32 *bitmap, unsigned int nbits,
> }
>
> no_mask = tb[ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_NOMASK];
> - if (no_mask)
> - ethnl_bitmap32_clear(bitmap, 0, nbits, mod);
> + if (no_mask) {
> + unsigned int nwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(nbits, 32);
> + unsigned int nbytes = nwords * sizeof(u32);
Hi Köry,
Thanks for addressing my concerns regarding the size calculations in v1.
I think that a comment is warranted describing the fact that only the map,
and not the mask part, is taken into account in the size calculations
above.
> +
> + tmp = kcalloc(nwords, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!tmp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + memcpy(tmp, bitmap, nbytes);
> + ethnl_bitmap32_clear(bitmap, 0, nbits, &dummy);
> + }
Perhaps we could consider something line the following.
Which would avoid the need for the n_mask condition
in the nla_for_each_nested() loop further below.
...
saved_bitmap = kcalloc(nwords, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!saved_bitmap)
return -ENOMEM;
memcpy(saved_bitmap, bitmap, nbytes);
ethnl_bitmap32_clear(bitmap, 0, nbits, &dummy);
orig_bitmap = saved_bitmap;
} else {
orig_bitmap = bitmap;
}
(Choosing names for variables seems hard today.)
>
> nla_for_each_nested(bit_attr, tb[ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS], rem) {
> bool old_val, new_val;
> @@ -458,13 +468,19 @@ ethnl_update_bitset32_verbose(u32 *bitmap, unsigned int nbits,
> if (nla_type(bit_attr) != ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS_BIT) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, bit_attr,
> "only ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS_BIT allowed in ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> }
> ret = ethnl_parse_bit(&idx, &new_val, nbits, bit_attr, no_mask,
> names, extack);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - old_val = bitmap[idx / 32] & ((u32)1 << (idx % 32));
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (no_mask)
> + old_val = tmp[idx / 32] & ((u32)1 << (idx % 32));
> + else
> + old_val = bitmap[idx / 32] & ((u32)1 << (idx % 32));
> +
> if (new_val != old_val) {
> if (new_val)
> bitmap[idx / 32] |= ((u32)1 << (idx % 32));
> @@ -474,7 +490,10 @@ ethnl_update_bitset32_verbose(u32 *bitmap, unsigned int nbits,
> }
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
> +out:
> + kfree(tmp);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int ethnl_compact_sanity_checks(unsigned int nbits,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-07 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-06 14:12 [PATCH net v2 1/1] ethtool: Fix mod state of verbose no_mask bitset Köry Maincent
2023-10-07 15:57 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231007155730.GF831234@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.