All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Introduce cpuctx->cgrp_ctx_list
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:04:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231009210425.GC6307@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cizC0J85ByuF5fBmc_Bqi=wpNJpiVsw+3F1Avusn2aQog@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 09:32:24AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:

> Yeah, I know.. but I couldn't come up with a better solution.

Not been near a compiler, and haven't fully thought it through, but
could something like the work work?


---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |   1 +
 kernel/events/core.c       | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index f31f962a6445..0367d748fae0 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -878,6 +878,7 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context {
 	unsigned int			embedded : 1;
 
 	unsigned int			nr_events;
+	unsigned int			nr_cgroups;
 
 	atomic_t			refcount; /* event <-> epc */
 	struct rcu_head			rcu_head;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 708d474c2ede..f3d5d47ecdfc 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ enum event_type_t {
 	EVENT_TIME = 0x4,
 	/* see ctx_resched() for details */
 	EVENT_CPU = 0x8,
+	EVENT_CGROUP = 0x10,
 	EVENT_ALL = EVENT_FLEXIBLE | EVENT_PINNED,
 };
 
@@ -684,20 +685,26 @@ do {									\
 	___p;								\
 })
 
-static void perf_ctx_disable(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
+static void perf_ctx_disable(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool cgroup)
 {
 	struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry)
+	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
+		if (cgroup && !pmu_ctx->nr_cgroups)
+			continue;
 		perf_pmu_disable(pmu_ctx->pmu);
+	}
 }
 
-static void perf_ctx_enable(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
+static void perf_ctx_enable(struct perf_event_context *ctx. bool cgroup)
 {
 	struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry)
+	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
+		if (cgroup && !pmu_ctx->nr_cgroups)
+			continue;
 		perf_pmu_enable(pmu_ctx->pmu);
+	}
 }
 
 static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx, enum event_type_t event_type);
@@ -856,9 +863,9 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task)
 		return;
 
 	perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
-	perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx);
+	perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx, true);
 
-	ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, EVENT_ALL);
+	ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, EVENT_ALL|EVENT_CGROUP);
 	/*
 	 * must not be done before ctxswout due
 	 * to update_cgrp_time_from_cpuctx() in
@@ -870,9 +877,9 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task)
 	 * perf_cgroup_set_timestamp() in ctx_sched_in()
 	 * to not have to pass task around
 	 */
-	ctx_sched_in(&cpuctx->ctx, EVENT_ALL);
+	ctx_sched_in(&cpuctx->ctx, EVENT_ALL|EVENT_CGROUP);
 
-	perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx);
+	perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx, true);
 	perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
 }
 
@@ -965,6 +972,8 @@ perf_cgroup_event_enable(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ct
 	if (!is_cgroup_event(event))
 		return;
 
+	event->pmu_ctx->nr_cgroups++;
+
 	/*
 	 * Because cgroup events are always per-cpu events,
 	 * @ctx == &cpuctx->ctx.
@@ -985,6 +994,8 @@ perf_cgroup_event_disable(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *c
 	if (!is_cgroup_event(event))
 		return;
 
+	event->pmu_ctx->nr_cgroups--;
+
 	/*
 	 * Because cgroup events are always per-cpu events,
 	 * @ctx == &cpuctx->ctx.
@@ -2677,9 +2688,9 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
 
 	event_type &= EVENT_ALL;
 
-	perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx);
+	perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx, false);
 	if (task_ctx) {
-		perf_ctx_disable(task_ctx);
+		perf_ctx_disable(task_ctx, false);
 		task_ctx_sched_out(task_ctx, event_type);
 	}
 
@@ -2697,9 +2708,9 @@ static void ctx_resched(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
 
 	perf_event_sched_in(cpuctx, task_ctx);
 
-	perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx);
+	perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx, false);
 	if (task_ctx)
-		perf_ctx_enable(task_ctx);
+		perf_ctx_enable(task_ctx, false);
 }
 
 void perf_pmu_resched(struct pmu *pmu)
@@ -3244,6 +3255,9 @@ ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx, enum event_type_t event_type)
 	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(&perf_cpu_context);
 	struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx;
 	int is_active = ctx->is_active;
+	bool cgroup = event_type & EVENT_CGROUP;
+
+	event_type &= ~EVENT_CGROUP;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
 
@@ -3290,8 +3304,11 @@ ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx, enum event_type_t event_type)
 
 	is_active ^= ctx->is_active; /* changed bits */
 
-	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry)
+	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
+		if (cgroup && !pmu_ctx->nr_cgroups)
+			continue;
 		__pmu_ctx_sched_out(pmu_ctx, is_active);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3482,7 +3499,7 @@ perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, struct task_struct *next)
 		raw_spin_lock_nested(&next_ctx->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 		if (context_equiv(ctx, next_ctx)) {
 
-			perf_ctx_disable(ctx);
+			perf_ctx_disable(ctx, false);
 
 			/* PMIs are disabled; ctx->nr_pending is stable. */
 			if (local_read(&ctx->nr_pending) ||
@@ -3502,7 +3519,7 @@ perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, struct task_struct *next)
 			perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(ctx, false);
 			perf_event_swap_task_ctx_data(ctx, next_ctx);
 
-			perf_ctx_enable(ctx);
+			perf_ctx_enable(ctx, false);
 
 			/*
 			 * RCU_INIT_POINTER here is safe because we've not
@@ -3526,13 +3543,13 @@ perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, struct task_struct *next)
 
 	if (do_switch) {
 		raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-		perf_ctx_disable(ctx);
+		perf_ctx_disable(ctx, false);
 
 inside_switch:
 		perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(ctx, false);
 		task_ctx_sched_out(ctx, EVENT_ALL);
 
-		perf_ctx_enable(ctx);
+		perf_ctx_enable(ctx, false);
 		raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 	}
 }
@@ -3818,47 +3835,32 @@ static int merge_sched_in(struct perf_event *event, void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ctx_pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx, struct pmu *pmu)
+static void pmu_groups_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
+				struct perf_event_groups *groups,
+				struct pmu *pmu)
 {
-	struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx;
 	int can_add_hw = 1;
-
-	if (pmu) {
-		visit_groups_merge(ctx, &ctx->pinned_groups,
-				   smp_processor_id(), pmu,
-				   merge_sched_in, &can_add_hw);
-	} else {
-		list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
-			can_add_hw = 1;
-			visit_groups_merge(ctx, &ctx->pinned_groups,
-					   smp_processor_id(), pmu_ctx->pmu,
-					   merge_sched_in, &can_add_hw);
-		}
-	}
+	visit_groups_merge(ctx, groups, smp_processor_id(), pmu,
+			   merge_sched_in, &can_add_hw);
 }
 
-static void ctx_flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx, struct pmu *pmu)
+static void ctx_groups_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
+				struct perf_event_groups *groups,
+				bool cgroup)
 {
 	struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx;
-	int can_add_hw = 1;
 
-	if (pmu) {
-		visit_groups_merge(ctx, &ctx->flexible_groups,
-				   smp_processor_id(), pmu,
-				   merge_sched_in, &can_add_hw);
-	} else {
-		list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
-			can_add_hw = 1;
-			visit_groups_merge(ctx, &ctx->flexible_groups,
-					   smp_processor_id(), pmu_ctx->pmu,
-					   merge_sched_in, &can_add_hw);
-		}
+	list_for_each_entry(pmu_ctx, &ctx->pmu_ctx_list, pmu_ctx_entry) {
+		if (cgroup && !pmu_ctx->nr_cgroups)
+			continue;
+		pmu_groups_sched_in(ctx, groups, pmu_ctx->pmu);
 	}
 }
 
-static void __pmu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx, struct pmu *pmu)
+static void __pmu_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
+			       struct pmu *pmu)
 {
-	ctx_flexible_sched_in(ctx, pmu);
+	pmu_groups_sched_in(ctx, &ctx->flexible_groups, pmu);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -3866,6 +3868,9 @@ ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx, enum event_type_t event_type)
 {
 	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(&perf_cpu_context);
 	int is_active = ctx->is_active;
+	bool cgroup = event_type & EVENT_CGROUP;
+
+	event_type &= ~EVENT_CGROUP;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
 
@@ -3898,11 +3903,11 @@ ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx, enum event_type_t event_type)
 	 * in order to give them the best chance of going on.
 	 */
 	if (is_active & EVENT_PINNED)
-		ctx_pinned_sched_in(ctx, NULL);
+		ctx_groups_sched_in(ctx, &ctx->pinned_groups, cgroup);
 
 	/* Then walk through the lower prio flexible groups */
 	if (is_active & EVENT_FLEXIBLE)
-		ctx_flexible_sched_in(ctx, NULL);
+		ctx_groups_sched_in(ctx, &ctx->flexible_groups, cgroup);
 }
 
 static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
@@ -3917,11 +3922,11 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
 
 	if (cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx) {
 		perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, ctx);
-		perf_ctx_disable(ctx);
+		perf_ctx_disable(ctx, false);
 
 		perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(ctx, true);
 
-		perf_ctx_enable(ctx);
+		perf_ctx_enable(ctx, false);
 		perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, ctx);
 		goto rcu_unlock;
 	}
@@ -3934,7 +3939,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
 	if (!ctx->nr_events)
 		goto unlock;
 
-	perf_ctx_disable(ctx);
+	perf_ctx_disable(ctx, false);
 	/*
 	 * We want to keep the following priority order:
 	 * cpu pinned (that don't need to move), task pinned,
@@ -3944,7 +3949,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
 	 * events, no need to flip the cpuctx's events around.
 	 */
 	if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ctx->pinned_groups.tree)) {
-		perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx);
+		perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx, false);
 		ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, EVENT_FLEXIBLE);
 	}
 
@@ -3953,9 +3958,9 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct task_struct *task)
 	perf_ctx_sched_task_cb(cpuctx->task_ctx, true);
 
 	if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&ctx->pinned_groups.tree))
-		perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx);
+		perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx, false);
 
-	perf_ctx_enable(ctx);
+	perf_ctx_enable(ctx, false);
 
 unlock:
 	perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, ctx);

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04  4:08 [PATCH] perf/core: Introduce cpuctx->cgrp_ctx_list Namhyung Kim
2023-10-04  7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-04 15:01   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-04 15:42     ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-04 21:27       ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-04 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-04 16:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-09 21:04     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-10-10  4:57       ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-11  3:45         ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-11  7:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-11  9:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-11 16:02               ` Namhyung Kim
2023-10-12 17:34       ` [tip: perf/core] perf: Optimize perf_cgroup_switch() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231009210425.GC6307@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.