From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 04/10] netdev-genl: Add netlink framework functions for queue
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 19:25:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231010192555.3126ca42@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <169658369951.3683.3529038539593903265.stgit@anambiarhost.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, 06 Oct 2023 02:14:59 -0700 Amritha Nambiar wrote:
> +static int
> +netdev_nl_queue_fill_one(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct net_device *netdev,
> + u32 q_idx, u32 q_type, const struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + void *hdr;
> +
> + hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
> + if (!hdr)
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_QUEUE_QUEUE_ID, q_idx))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_QUEUE_QUEUE_TYPE, q_type))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX, netdev->ifindex))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
You can combine these ifs in a single one using ||
> + switch (q_type) {
> + case NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX:
> + rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(netdev, q_idx);
> + if (rxq->napi && nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_QUEUE_NAPI_ID,
> +static int netdev_nl_queue_validate(struct net_device *netdev, u32 q_id,
> + u32 q_type)
> +{
> + switch (q_type) {
> + case NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX:
> + if (q_id >= netdev->real_num_rx_queues)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> + case NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX:
> + if (q_id >= netdev->real_num_tx_queues)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Doesn't the netlink policy prevent this already?
> + }
> +}
> int netdev_nl_queue_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> {
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + u32 q_id, q_type, ifindex;
> + struct net_device *netdev;
> + struct sk_buff *rsp;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_QUEUE_QUEUE_ID))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_QUEUE_QUEUE_TYPE))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX))
> + return -EINVAL;
You can combine these checks in a single if using ||
> + q_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_QUEUE_ID]);
> +
> + q_type = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_QUEUE_TYPE]);
> +
> + ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX]);
No need for the empty lines between these.
> + rsp = genlmsg_new(GENLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rsp)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + rtnl_lock();
> +
> + netdev = __dev_get_by_index(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
> + if (netdev)
> + err = netdev_nl_queue_fill(rsp, netdev, q_id, q_type, info);
double space after =
> + else
> + err = -ENODEV;
> +
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> + if (err)
> + goto err_free_msg;
> +
> + return genlmsg_reply(rsp, info);
> +
> +err_free_msg:
> + nlmsg_free(rsp);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(struct net_device *netdev, struct sk_buff *rsp,
> + const struct genl_info *info, unsigned int *start_rx,
> + unsigned int *start_tx)
> +{
Hm. Not sure why you don't operate directly on ctx here.
Why pass the indexes by pointer individually?
> + int err = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = *start_rx; i < netdev->real_num_rx_queues;) {
> + err = netdev_nl_queue_fill_one(rsp, netdev, i,
> + NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, info);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_err;
return, no need to goto if all it does is returns
> + *start_rx = i++;
> + }
> + for (i = *start_tx; i < netdev->real_num_tx_queues;) {
> + err = netdev_nl_queue_fill_one(rsp, netdev, i,
> + NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, info);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_err;
> + *start_tx = i++;
> + }
> +out_err:
> + return err;
> }
>
> int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> {
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + struct netdev_nl_dump_ctx *ctx = netdev_dump_ctx(cb);
> + const struct genl_info *info = genl_info_dump(cb);
> + struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
> + unsigned int rxq_idx = ctx->rxq_idx;
> + unsigned int txq_idx = ctx->txq_idx;
> + struct net_device *netdev;
> + u32 ifindex = 0;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX])
> + ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX]);
> +
> + rtnl_lock();
> + if (ifindex) {
> + netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
> + if (netdev)
> + err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info,
> + &rxq_idx, &txq_idx);
> + else
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + } else {
> + for_each_netdev_dump(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
> + err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info,
> + &rxq_idx, &txq_idx);
> +
unnecessary new line
> + if (err < 0)
> + break;
> + if (!err) {
it only returns 0 or negative errno, doesn't it?
> + rxq_idx = 0;
> + txq_idx = 0;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> + if (err != -EMSGSIZE)
> + return err;
> +
> + ctx->rxq_idx = rxq_idx;
> + ctx->txq_idx = txq_idx;
> + return skb->len;
> }
>
> static int netdev_genl_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-06 9:14 [net-next PATCH v4 00/10] Introduce queue and NAPI support in netdev-genl (Was: Introduce NAPI queues support) Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-06 9:14 ` [net-next PATCH v4 01/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev netlink spec in YAML for queue Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-11 2:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 23:28 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2023-10-06 9:14 ` [net-next PATCH v4 02/10] net: Add queue and napi association Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-11 2:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 23:36 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2023-10-06 9:14 ` [net-next PATCH v4 03/10] ice: Add support in the driver for associating queue with napi Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-06 9:14 ` [net-next PATCH v4 04/10] netdev-genl: Add netlink framework functions for queue Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-11 2:25 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-10-11 23:54 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2023-10-12 23:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-13 0:24 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2023-10-13 0:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-13 0:40 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2023-10-13 0:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-06 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH v4 05/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev netlink spec in YAML for NAPI Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-06 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH v4 06/10] netdev-genl: Add netlink framework functions for napi Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-11 2:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-11 23:55 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2023-10-06 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH v4 07/10] netdev-genl: spec: Add irq in netdev netlink YAML spec Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-06 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH v4 08/10] net: Add NAPI IRQ support Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-06 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH v4 09/10] netdev-genl: spec: Add PID in netdev netlink YAML spec Amritha Nambiar
2023-10-06 9:15 ` [net-next PATCH v4 10/10] netdev-genl: Add PID for the NAPI thread Amritha Nambiar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231010192555.3126ca42@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.