From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the iommu tree
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:58:32 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231011135832.GX3952@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011160357.292c84e3@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the iommufd tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/iommu.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 4601cd2d7c4c ("iommu: Add ops->domain_alloc_paging()")
>
> from the iommu tree and commit:
>
> 909f4abd1097 ("iommu: Add new iommu op to create domains owned by userspace")
>
> from the iommufd tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks right, thanks
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 5:03 linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the iommu tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-11 13:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-06-30 6:00 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-30 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-03-21 8:09 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-27 4:55 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-27 6:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-30 18:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-31 5:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-31 11:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-02 23:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-03 0:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-26 3:27 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25 4:44 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25 12:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-02 23:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-25 12:16 ` Baolu Lu
2023-10-25 12:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-25 12:25 ` Baolu Lu
2023-10-23 4:56 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-16 6:21 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-04 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-04 12:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-04 19:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231011135832.GX3952@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.