From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Subject: [bpf-next:master 6/13] net/core/filter.c:11773:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path'
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:55:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310121712.SMfVJDGT-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
head: d2dc885b8c9ddb6fc374d93a87f8f2d1b97d2caf
commit: 53e380d21441909b12b6e0782b77187ae4b971c4 [6/13] bpf: Add bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path() to allow writing unix sockaddr from bpf
config: um-i386_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231012/202310121712.SMfVJDGT-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231012/202310121712.SMfVJDGT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310121712.SMfVJDGT-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/core/filter.c:11747:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_from_skb' [-Wmissing-declarations]
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_from_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, u64 flags,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:11760:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_from_xdp' [-Wmissing-declarations]
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_from_xdp(struct xdp_buff *xdp, u64 flags,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/filter.c:11773:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path' [-Wmissing-declarations]
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path(struct bpf_sock_addr_kern *sa_kern,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/filter.c:11877:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_sock_destroy' [-Wmissing-declarations]
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path +11773 net/core/filter.c
11772
11773 __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path(struct bpf_sock_addr_kern *sa_kern,
11774 const u8 *sun_path, u32 sun_path__sz)
11775 {
11776 struct sockaddr_un *un;
11777
11778 if (sa_kern->sk->sk_family != AF_UNIX)
11779 return -EINVAL;
11780
11781 /* We do not allow changing the address to unnamed or larger than the
11782 * maximum allowed address size for a unix sockaddr.
11783 */
11784 if (sun_path__sz == 0 || sun_path__sz > UNIX_PATH_MAX)
11785 return -EINVAL;
11786
11787 un = (struct sockaddr_un *)sa_kern->uaddr;
11788 memcpy(un->sun_path, sun_path, sun_path__sz);
11789 sa_kern->uaddrlen = offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + sun_path__sz;
11790
11791 return 0;
11792 }
11793 __diag_pop();
11794
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202310121712.SMfVJDGT-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.