From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Joey Jiao <quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com>, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Add CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE option
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 02:24:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011074438.6098-1-quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com>
Hi Joey,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on mcgrof/modules-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231012]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joey-Jiao/module-Add-CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE-option/20231011-154640
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git modules-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231011074438.6098-1-quic_jiangenj%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] module: Add CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE option
config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231013/202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231013/202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/module/main.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/module/main.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/module/main.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/module/main.c:2628:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2628 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2637:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2637 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2659:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2659 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2702:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2702 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2723:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2723 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2756:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2756 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2775:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2775 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2794:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2794 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:2831:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
2831 | {
| ^
>> kernel/module/main.c:3039:1: error: function declared in block scope cannot have 'static' storage class
3039 | SYSCALL_DEFINE3(init_module, void __user *, umod,
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
230 | __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:247:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
247 | static inline long __do_sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__));\
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3039:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
230 | __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:250:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
250 | { \
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3041:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
3041 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3074:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
3074 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3105:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
3105 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3125:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
3125 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3153:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
3153 | {
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3170:1: error: function declared in block scope cannot have 'static' storage class
3170 | SYSCALL_DEFINE3(finit_module, int, fd, const char __user *, uargs, int, flags)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
230 | __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:247:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
247 | static inline long __do_sys##name(__MAP(x,__SC_DECL,__VA_ARGS__));\
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3170:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
include/linux/syscalls.h:221:36: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINE3'
221 | #define SYSCALL_DEFINE3(name, ...) SYSCALL_DEFINEx(3, _##name, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:230:2: note: expanded from macro 'SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
230 | __SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, sname, __VA_ARGS__)
| ^
include/linux/syscalls.h:250:2: note: expanded from macro '__SYSCALL_DEFINEx'
250 | { \
| ^
kernel/module/main.c:3171:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
3171 | {
| ^
fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=]
12 warnings and 20 errors generated.
vim +2628 kernel/module/main.c
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2626
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2627 static int may_init_module(void)
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 @2628 {
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2629 if (!capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE) || modules_disabled)
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2630 return -EPERM;
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2631
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2632 return 0;
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2633 }
34e1169d996ab1 kernel/module.c Kees Cook 2012-10-16 2634
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 7:44 [PATCH v2] module: Add CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_IN_SEQUENCE option Joey Jiao
2023-10-11 11:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-11 19:20 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-10-12 18:24 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-10-12 18:35 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202310130236.lYbPy0lh-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quic_jiangenj@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.